City St George’s, University of London - City vs Birkbeck University of London vs Ulster University vs University of Cumbria vs St George's University of London
Side-by-side comparison from 232 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff
- +Excellent location and vibrant surrounding environment
- +High employability support and valuable internship opportunities
- +Supportive and caring staff communication
- +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse and motivated student community
- +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
- +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
- +Excellent location and facilities
- +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
- +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
- +Enjoyable study environment and facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty, strong learning environment
- +Excellent practical experience, real-world applications, and career opportunities
- +High-quality facilities and unique, comprehensive communication skills training
Nothing to show
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Poor teaching quality and low academic standards.
- -Unmet expectations and perceived focus on profit over student learning.
- -Inappropriate course focus for experienced professionals.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum is seen as outdated and lacking practical relevance.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
This institution achieves impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Facilities, rated at 4.35, and Internationality, at 4.33. Student Life and Location also perform well, both above 4.1. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.95, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid standing with a slight opportunity for enhancement in student housing.
Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.
This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.
With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in its **Professors** and **Value** ratings, both at an excellent 4.44. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive strong marks, around 4.2. **Internationality** mirrors the student life score. The **Location** is rated moderately well at 3.78, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.63.
Nothing to show
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 106 reviews, ~91.5% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights strong courses, knowledgeable staff, and ideal city-centre locations. Very few reviews (approx. 1.9%) express dissatisfaction.
With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.
With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.
Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.
Most reviews are positive (~78%), highlighting excellent faculty support, strong real-world applications, and practical experience, particularly in healthcare. Some minor administrative issues were noted.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
One positive thing about the university is that they really do emphasise the importance employability and getting that professional experience. I do admire that a lot since they put an importance on preparing students for their future careers. One downside that I have is that there is not much support when it comes to internships and placements which is a bit frustrating since we are left to our own resources. Rather than the university collaborating with companies to make placements mandatory within the course its an option. So we are not guarranted an internship or placement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
