University of Antwerp vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs VIVES University of Applied Sciences - VIVES vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 221 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +Accessible and responsive administration and teachers
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +Professors' passion, expertise, and support for student success
- +Strong theory-to-practice integration and practical application
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Engaging community activities and supportive environment
- +Strong, comprehensive business education
- +Numerous international opportunities
- +Practical, relevant, and up-to-date curriculum
- +Supportive staff and approachable professors
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world application
- +Welcoming environment and opportunities for social integration
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from administration and faculty.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors.
- -Excessive administrative burden and inefficient management processes
- -Lack of modern technology and outdated facilities
- -Insufficient faculty support and unresponsive staff
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and impersonal teaching styles are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
This university garners particularly strong marks in **Internationality** (4.54) and **Location** (4.43), indicating these are significant advantages. Areas like **Professors** (4.29) and **Value** (4.33) also receive commendation. The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation** (4.02), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with standout strengths.
Overall, this institution receives a positive evaluation, with particularly strong scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated at approximately 4.3. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also received solid ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation** at around 3.7 and **Internationality**, which scored approximately 3.56.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest asset, boasting the highest rating. Professors and Value also received notably strong scores. Conversely, Location received the lowest rating, indicating it as a weaker area for the institution. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Accomodation are rated moderately, showing a generally consistent performance across these elements.
This university garners strong scores across most assessed categories. Location stands out as its highest-rated aspect. Areas like Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also receive commendable feedback. Accommodation, while still positive, appears to be the lowest-scoring category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particularly excellent location.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
Nearly all 52 reviews are positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight accessible administration, responsive and passionate teachers, and a welcoming international atmosphere.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences is highly recommended, with ~89% of reviews being positive. Students praise well-structured lessons, practical application, and good facilities. Some minor areas for improvement include more teacher support during practical sessions.
Students generally report a positive experience (~100%), highlighting a demanding yet solid foundation in business and management. Recurring themes include opportunities for international experiences and practical, up-to-date course content.
With a 4.15 average rating from 61 reviews, ~93% of students highlight positive experiences, praising approachable professors, practical teaching, and supportive staff. There is no negative feedback reported.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences really nails that combo of theory and practical learning. Useful information is jam-packed into the courses, and the lab sessions are seriously awesome since we get to mess around with all kinds of aircraft and even helicopters. Plus, all the resources they give us really help us take what we learn in class and use it in the real world without any hassle. You know, some teachers like to let us figure things out ourselves, but most of them are super into explaining stuff and really good at it. All in all, VIVES is a great pick for anyone wanting hands-on, future-oriented learning.
Nothing to show
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
