KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs University of Liege vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 224 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, project-based learning and preparation for the job market.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and readily available guidance.
- +Modern facilities and opportunities for connection and collaboration.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Relevant and practical course content
- +Welcoming and collaborative atmosphere
- +Exceptional academic and research opportunities
- +Strong student support and welcoming environment
- +Wide course selection and excellent facilities
- +Strong business and management foundation
- +Emphasis on real-world relevance and current company issues
- +Numerous international opportunities and study abroad experiences
- +Practical, real-world application of theory
- +Supportive, approachable lecturers and dynamic classes
- +Opportunities for international exposure and diverse collaboration
- +Practical, well-structured programs with real-world projects
- +Approachable faculty and strong student support systems
- +Welcoming community and diverse opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Excessive workload and unrealistic deadlines.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from faculty and administration.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Excessive academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support from faculty and staff are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -High costs and poor value for money are common complaints.
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff and teachers.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest mark at 4.74. Location and Value also scored very well, reflecting positively on the overall student experience. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest category, with a rating of 3.68, indicating an area for potential improvement. Professors and Student Life also demonstrate strong, above-average performance.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most categories. Professors are a standout area with a score of 4.44, indicating strong academic guidance. Value is also highly rated at 4.32. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score at 3.94, suggesting room for growth in fostering a more global environment within the student body.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas are Professors and Value, both receiving a high rating of 3.90. Student Life also scores well at 3.85. The weakest area identified is Location, with a rating of 3.41, though other categories like Facilities (3.65) remain respectable.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Professors and Value are also notable strengths. Conversely, the university's facilities and location received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student life, accommodation, and professors also contributed positively to the overall assessment.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also scored highly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weakest aspects, with notably lower scores. The **Value** received a solid, above-average rating, contributing to an overall positive university profile.
This university demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also scores highly, suggesting a desirable setting. Conversely, the areas of **Accomodation** and **Student Life** show the lowest ratings, indicating room for improvement in these aspects. Facilities and Professors received solid, mid-range scores.
Nothing to show
The vast majority of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, supportive professors, and convenient resources. Students appreciate the real-world project focus and guidance. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising insightful content, expert lecturers, and a welcoming atmosphere. A small amount of feedback noted high pressure and mental health concerns.
The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs and research opportunities. Students appreciate the faculty support, diverse course selections, and adequate facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 41 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise the demanding yet foundational business programs and opportunities for international experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
With 49 positive reviews out of 55, ~89% of students highlight practical learning, valuable skills, and approachable lecturers. Communication challenges with local language immersion and event organization were minor concerns for some.
With a 4.36/5 average rating from 11 reviews, ~91% are positive, highlighting a challenging yet rewarding curriculum, supportive people, and practical, career-focused education. A small ~9% of feedback mentioned issues with staff attitude and respect.
Nothing to show
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Nothing to show
