Sciences Po vs Université de Reims vs SKEMA Business School vs Excelia Business School vs European Communication School - ECS
Side-by-side comparison from 270 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +Professional and up-to-date programs
- +User-friendly communication and processes
- +Positive hostel experience despite room size
- +International opportunities and diverse student body
- +Practical, career-focused programs with industry-relevant skills
- +Supportive faculty and excellent campus infrastructure
- +Practical and relevant curriculum with good quality teaching
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Strong career preparation and alumni network
- +Dedicated and present teachers
- +Personalized support
- +Enriching experience
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention hinder effective learning.
- -Administrative and management issues including poor communication, exam management, and student guidance.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and concerns about racial discrimination.
- -Disorganized programs with excessive workload and unclear evaluation methods.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and inadequate career support for the cost
- -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Communication and support from faculty and staff are often lacking.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
This institution shows a strong profile, particularly excelling in its **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Accommodations** and **professors** also receive solid marks. Areas with the most room for improvement include **facilities**, **student life**, and **internationality**, all rated at 3.5. Overall, the university offers good value and a well-rounded experience.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with Professors and Internationality receiving the highest scores. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Overall, the university presents a generally positive image, with a few specific strengths and one notable area for development.
This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Internationality** (4.34), **Student Life** (4.27), and **Location** (4.27). Facilities and Value also receive positive marks, both around 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.58, while Professors are rated a respectable 3.91.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting strong ratings for Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Student Life and Location are also considered solid. However, the Facilities category received a significantly lower score, indicating a primary area for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Reviews praise professional and up-to-date programs, and user-friendly communication. Some mention comfortable hostels with minor issues like small rooms and average food.
With an average rating of 4.36, most students (~90%) highlight practical courses, career opportunities, and international experiences. A small percentage (~3%) report issues with management, communication, and course organization.
~94.7% of reviews are positive, praising practical curriculum, international opportunities, and good teaching. A small ~5.3% of feedback expressed disappointment with course depth and professional training.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights an incredible and enriching experience. The student praised the dedicated teachers and personalized support as significant assets. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
