Sciences Po vs Université de Bourgogne - UB vs SKEMA Business School vs Burgundy School of Business vs Clermont School of Business
Side-by-side comparison from 351 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum and diverse academic focus
- +Networking opportunities and career prospects
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical skill development and personal growth
- +Welcoming and inspiring campus environment
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +modern facilities and organization
- +international environment and diverse student body
- +quality teaching and practical learning experiences
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Academics are often ineffective and lack preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of relevant coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues, including lack of student support.
- -Overloaded schedules and insufficient opportunities for independent learning or skill development.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners impressive scores, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.7. **Location** and **Value** also score very highly, both at 4.39. Student life and professors also received strong ratings above 4.2. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.16, while facilities are rated at 3.83.
Performance shows a very strong showing in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring over 4.0. Facilities and Value also received high marks, hitting a 4.0 average. The university's weakest area is Professors, with a rating just under 4.0.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area, achieving a rating of 4.61. **Location** also received high marks at 4.42. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring 4.10. Other categories such as Professors, Student Life, and Value all fall within a closely clustered range of 4.30 to 4.37, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With ~96% positive feedback and an average 4.08/5 rating, students praise the interdisciplinary curriculum, academic excellence, and vibrant student life. A small ~4% of reviews express disappointment with specific academic approaches.
With ~100% positive feedback from 34 reviews and an average rating of 4.03/5, students highlight respected faculty, practical programs, and an inclusive campus culture. No negative reviews were provided.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, international environment, and practical learning. A small minority, ~5%, express disappointment with teaching quality and program relevance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
The course itself was great as it gave me ideas into a new world and now i have a better understanding and the know-how in fintech. Overall, teaching staff are professionnel and supporting in ensuring we get the best out of our time there
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
