IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs KEDGE Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 525 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Deusto Business School (5.00)
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 3/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
KEDGE Business School: wins 3/7 categories
Deusto Business School: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Master's Degree in Finance
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.22
4.21
4.20
4.30
Win
Not rated
3.43
Location
4.29
4.66
Win
4.25
3.73
4.31
Not rated
4.64
Professors
4.28
4.12
4.41
Win
4.32
4.15
Not rated
3.86
Internationality
4.55
4.63
4.36
4.41
4.76
Win
Not rated
4.50
Student life
4.25
4.30
Win
4.11
4.14
4.18
Not rated
4.07
Value
4.31
4.49
Win
4.04
4.05
4.09
Not rated
3.64
Accommodation
3.78
4.00
3.58
3.14
4.03
Win
1.00
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international community and global opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and active student associations
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Strong academic programmes with practical application
  • +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
  • +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Diverse international environment and student community
  • +Engaging and expert-led teaching with real-world focus
  • +Strong career support and networking opportunities
  • +High academic standards and professional faculty
  • +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
  • +Rigorous and structured learning environment
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
Cons
  • -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
  • -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Teaching quality and course content are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and insufficient.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

This institution demonstrates a remarkably strong showing in **Internationality**, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other areas like Facilities and Location also received very positive feedback, while Professors, Student Life, and Value present solid, though slightly less exceptional, performance metrics.

The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

With a 4.03 average rating from 33 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting engaging classes, expert faculty, networking opportunities, and a diverse, supportive environment. One review expressed dissatisfaction with the teaching level.

With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
63%
49%
39%
33%
200%
21%
4★
44%
27%
42%
52%
39%
0%
50%
3★
9%
10%
7%
9%
24%
0%
43%
2★
0%
0%
1%
2%
3%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Lookin go out for your future

Kedge Business School provides a wide range of options and possibilities, including a comprehensive selection of degree programs supported by a dedicated faculty. The university's courses are regarded for being tough. Furthermore, the university focuses providing students with the tools they need for their professions, as evidenced by the numerous networking possibilities offered through professional fairs. The university's career center provides complete assistance, including résumé building and interview preparation.

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close