Hasselt University - UHasselt vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs University of Mons - UMONS
Side-by-side comparison from 199 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Challenging academics and supportive staff
- +Welcoming atmosphere and international diversity
- +Affordable tuition and rewarding learning experience
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world skills development.
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Unique, engaging programs merging technology with business/marketing.
- +Practical, relevant content and scenario-based learning
- +Friendly, inclusive, and collaborative atmosphere
- +Networking opportunities and meeting diverse professionals
- +Solid business & management foundation
- +International study & real-world experiences
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum
- +Dedicated professors and supportive guidance
- +Well-structured curriculum and modern facilities
- +Welcoming international environment and vibrant student life
- +Practical, real-world relevant programmes
- +Approachable and helpful lecturers
- +Enriching international opportunities and campus life
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
- -The academic programs and teaching quality are often disappointing.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -There are recurring issues with course content and teaching quality.
- -Intense pressure and negative mental health impact.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
- -Communication issues and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Students dislike outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -They express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and lack of support.
- -Students find the curriculum inflexible and outdated.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of communication and unclear administrative processes.
- -Limited academic support and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution generally receives positive feedback across its various aspects. The strongest areas are clearly Professors, closely followed by Location and Facilities. Student Life and Accommodation are rated comparably, representing the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, though still indicating a generally favorable reception.
Across various metrics, this university demonstrates notable strengths. Internationality stands out with the highest rating, followed closely by Value and Location. Student Life and Professors also receive favorable marks. Conversely, Facilities and Accommodations are areas with the lowest scores. The overall performance suggests a university with a global outlook and good academic support, though physical resources and housing could be areas for development.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.44. Other well-regarded aspects include **Value** (4.28) and **Location** (4.13). The area with the lowest score is **Internationality**, rated at 3.88. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all solid, clustering around 4.06.
This university garners high marks for Internationality, its strongest area, with a rating of 4.39. Value is also a significant strength at 4.12. Professors are well-regarded with a score of 4.0. Areas for improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.33, and Location, which received the lowest score of 3.06. Student Life and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance across key areas. Its strongest aspects lie in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both earning a commendable 4 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accommodation**, which received the lowest scores of 3.2. **Student Life** and **Value** are rated moderately at 3.6, while **Internationality** stands out with a strong 3.8.
Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in **Location**, receiving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also score highly, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker points, with scores of approximately 3.9 and 3.8 respectively. Ratings for **Professors** and **Value** are solid, sitting at around 4.16 and 4.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
All 19 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students praise the challenging yet rewarding academics, the welcoming international atmosphere, and approachable professors. There were no negative reviews.
With ~94% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.41/5, reviews highlight practical, project-based learning and supportive lecturers. Some students found assignment volume overwhelming.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (around 97%), with students praising scenario-based teaching, hands-on work, and knowledgeable lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions high pressure and mental health concerns.
Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.09/5. Students highlight the program's demanding yet solid foundation, practical learning with real-life cases, and international opportunities like Erasmus. No negative feedback was recorded.
With 100% positive feedback, students praise high-quality education, modern facilities, and a supportive environment. Recurring themes include dedicated professors, excellent student support, and vibrant campus life, particularly for international students.
With 42 positive reviews out of 48, students highly praise dynamic and practical courses, helpful lecturers, and valuable real-life skills. There are no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Wide range of knowledge acquired and even though this comes at the price of a heavy workload, I'd say it's worth it. The professors are very approachable and it is generally a health learning environment. For international students, the tuition is an absolute steal, given the quality of education.
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
The course was expertly presented and covered practical, relevant, and up-to-date content that gives you a cutting-edge understanding of cross-border company affairs. In addition, I got the opportunity to meet new professionals from other countries.
Nothing to show
University of Mons is one of the big universities in Belgium. We have more guidance than the other universities. The study program is adapted to each student. The student life is interested because there are many campuses in Mons.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
