Hasselt University - UHasselt vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs University of Namur - Unamur vs ICHEC Brussels Management School
Side-by-side comparison from 246 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-organized onboarding and supportive staff
- +Approachable professors and engaging academic environment
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse international community
- +International diversity and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world learning and career preparation
- +Supportive environment and excellent facilities
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +Welcoming environment and diverse student body
- +Support for personal projects and academic programs
- +Student opinions considered in decision-making
- +Strong, comprehensive business education
- +Numerous international opportunities
- +Practical, relevant, and up-to-date curriculum
- +Supportive and approachable staff and coaches
- +Practical, practice-oriented teaching methodology
- +Welcoming atmosphere and opportunities to connect with peers
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited career services and support discourage students.
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of communication and student support is a concern.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and impersonal teaching styles are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are common complaints.
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
With a strong emphasis on academics and campus environment, this university garners excellent marks in key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.7, closely followed by facilities at 4.53 and value at 4.55. Student life, while still good at 4.15, represents the area with the lowest score. Accommodation also receives slightly lower, though still positive, feedback at 4.05.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its international student community, earning the highest rating for internationality. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong score for academic instruction. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, which received the lowest ratings. Student life and location are rated positively, contributing to a generally favorable overall assessment, particularly in terms of value.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
Overall, this institution garners very positive evaluations. Student life stands out with a perfect score, representing its strongest area. Facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all receive excellent marks of 4 or 4.5. Professors are also highly rated at 4.5. No specific weak areas were identified, with all categories scoring at least a 4.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest asset, boasting the highest rating. Professors and Value also received notably strong scores. Conversely, Location received the lowest rating, indicating it as a weaker area for the institution. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Accomodation are rated moderately, showing a generally consistent performance across these elements.
An overview of the university's ratings indicates strengths in its **Location**, scoring the highest at 4.44, closely followed by **Professors** (4.21) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Student Life** also received a solid 4.2. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.68 and **Facilities** at 3.92. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.05.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.65/5, reviews highlight approachable professors and a welcoming atmosphere. Students appreciate the well-structured onboarding and enriching diversity.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.37/5, students highlight an international atmosphere, practical learning, and supportive staff. A small percentage of reviews mentioned some general courses being less relevant.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted welcoming environments and helpful support for personal projects. No negative feedback was received.
Students generally report a positive experience (~100%), highlighting a demanding yet solid foundation in business and management. Recurring themes include opportunities for international experiences and practical, up-to-date course content.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~87% of feedback being highly favorable. Students appreciate practical teaching, dedicated staff, and personal support. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
Wide range of knowledge acquired and even though this comes at the price of a heavy workload, I'd say it's worth it. The professors are very approachable and it is generally a health learning environment. For international students, the tuition is an absolute steal, given the quality of education.
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
