Hasselt University - UHasselt vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences vs VIVES University of Applied Sciences - VIVES
Side-by-side comparison from 254 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-organized onboarding and supportive staff
- +Approachable professors and engaging academic environment
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse international community
- +Practical, real-world learning and project-based skills
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers/professors
- +Excellent facilities and student support services
- +Accessible and responsive administration and teachers
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +Professors' passion, expertise, and support for student success
- +Supportive and welcoming staff and community.
- +Practical, engaging, and challenging courses.
- +Enriching international environment and opportunities.
- +Strong theory-to-practice integration and practical application
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Engaging community activities and supportive environment
- +Supportive staff and approachable professors
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world application
- +Welcoming environment and opportunities for social integration
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from administration and faculty.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and poor teaching methods are disappointing.
- -Excessive administrative burden and inefficient management processes
- -Lack of modern technology and outdated facilities
- -Insufficient faculty support and unresponsive staff
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
With a strong emphasis on academics and campus environment, this university garners excellent marks in key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.7, closely followed by facilities at 4.53 and value at 4.55. Student life, while still good at 4.15, represents the area with the lowest score. Accommodation also receives slightly lower, though still positive, feedback at 4.05.
The university demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality, earning a rating of 4.72, and strong marks for value (4.36) and professors (4.27). Its location and student life also received positive scores, both above 4.0. Conversely, accommodations represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.61, followed by facilities at 3.80.
This university garners particularly strong marks in **Internationality** (4.54) and **Location** (4.43), indicating these are significant advantages. Areas like **Professors** (4.29) and **Value** (4.33) also receive commendation. The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation** (4.02), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with standout strengths.
This university garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving a high rating of 4.6. **Value** also stands out at 4.46. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.94, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates solid performance across most surveyed categories.
Overall, this institution receives a positive evaluation, with particularly strong scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated at approximately 4.3. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also received solid ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation** at around 3.7 and **Internationality**, which scored approximately 3.56.
This university garners strong scores across most assessed categories. Location stands out as its highest-rated aspect. Areas like Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also receive commendable feedback. Accommodation, while still positive, appears to be the lowest-scoring category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particularly excellent location.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.65/5, reviews highlight approachable professors and a welcoming atmosphere. Students appreciate the well-structured onboarding and enriching diversity.
Nearly all 64 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight engaging, practical classes and excellent support, with a few mentioning overwhelming assignments.
Nearly all 52 reviews are positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight accessible administration, responsive and passionate teachers, and a welcoming international atmosphere.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 35 students rating it 4-5 stars. Recurring themes highlight a supportive, embracing "family" atmosphere, with welcoming staff and engaging, practical courses.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences is highly recommended, with ~89% of reviews being positive. Students praise well-structured lessons, practical application, and good facilities. Some minor areas for improvement include more teacher support during practical sessions.
With a 4.15 average rating from 61 reviews, ~93% of students highlight positive experiences, praising approachable professors, practical teaching, and supportive staff. There is no negative feedback reported.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
Wide range of knowledge acquired and even though this comes at the price of a heavy workload, I'd say it's worth it. The professors are very approachable and it is generally a health learning environment. For international students, the tuition is an absolute steal, given the quality of education.
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences really nails that combo of theory and practical learning. Useful information is jam-packed into the courses, and the lab sessions are seriously awesome since we get to mess around with all kinds of aircraft and even helicopters. Plus, all the resources they give us really help us take what we learn in class and use it in the real world without any hassle. You know, some teachers like to let us figure things out ourselves, but most of them are super into explaining stuff and really good at it. All in all, VIVES is a great pick for anyone wanting hands-on, future-oriented learning.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
