Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Roma Tre - uniroma3 vs LUISS Guido Carli vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 160 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world application of theory
- +High-quality faculty with professional experience
- +Engaging and inspiring learning experiences
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Engaging professors and academic excellence
- +Supportive campus services and resources
- +Practical learning experiences and internships
- +Rigorous academics and top professors
- +Real-world application and practical skills
- +Personal and professional development
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Structured learning and international community
- +Positive location and good opportunities
- +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
- +International perspective and understanding of the industry
- +Teachers as current specialists
- -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessionalism and corruption.
- -Lack of promised resources and outdated/inadequate course content.
- -Difficulty reaching staff and unresolved technical/system issues.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
- -Inadequate teaching style and lack of professor accessibility.
- -Poor student support and excessive academic pressure.
- -Language barriers and incompetent staff hinder understanding.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective communication
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
- -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
A generally positive university review highlights exceptional strength in **Internationality**, scoring a near-perfect 4.8. **Location** also stands out with a high rating of 4.6. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score, at 3.94, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value also garnered strong marks above 4.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
The university garners praise in several key areas, with professors and location both receiving the highest marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present the weakest aspects, scoring lower than other categories. The overall value proposition is rated positively, reflecting a balanced but uneven performance.
This institution garners exceptional marks in its facilities, achieving a score of 4.54. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, both at 4.36, closely followed by location (4.33) and value (4.29). Student life is also a positive aspect, rated at 4.19. The lowest rated area is accommodation, with a score of 3.65.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.
With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), praising practical learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~6%) of feedback highlights issues with diploma delivery, administrative support, and perceived unprofessionalism.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive. Students commend professors' competence and teaching, engaging course content, and organized campus services. A small portion of feedback notes a theoretical approach in some fields.
Nearly 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense, deep courses, real-world challenges, and personal growth. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions an unengaging teaching style and limited student assistance for academic matters.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.
With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.
Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The ability of LUISS Guido Carli to foster an excellent learning environment is truly unparalleled. Due to the several committed and capable professors at LUISS Guido Carli, I have had a really positive private involvement. Because I could visit the campus anytime I needed help with my academic schedule, I had a terrific time at LUISS Guido Carli. During my two and a half years there, every instructor was excellent and showed me a lot. I would recommend it to someone who is having trouble deciding what they want to do going forward.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
