KU Leuven vs Vlerick Business School vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 214 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous and enriching academic programs
- +Strong international community and diverse student body
- +Well-experienced professors and practical course content
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive lecturers and staff
- +Enriching international environment and opportunities
- +Comprehensive and relevant curriculum with a focus on real-world application
- +Strong emphasis on international opportunities and career readiness
- +Supportive faculty and high-quality, structured education
- +Practical, real-world relevant programmes
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Valuable projects and international opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, well-structured programs with real-world projects
- +Approachable faculty and strong student support systems
- +Welcoming community and diverse opportunities
- -Excessive workloads and limited study spaces.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful staff.
- -Stressful, high-stakes assessment methods.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Restrictive international student policies and rising tuition fees are unwelcome.
- -Endless administrative red tape and complicated procedures cause frustration.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning experience.
- -Limited career services and job placement support are disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff and teachers.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes.
This institution achieves excellent scores across several aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.32). Value for money also received a high mark (4.29). Conversely, the weakest area appears to be Accommodation (3.61), though Facilities (4) and Student Life (3.90) remain solid. Professors' ratings (3.87) are also respectable.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its facilities, achieving a remarkable 4.64. Student life and value also stand out, both scoring above 4.2. Internationality and accommodation are similarly well-regarded. The university's weakest area, comparatively, is its location, rated at 3.94. Professor quality is also solid, at 4.27.
Academic and global engagement are clear strengths for this institution, with high marks for Internationality and a commendable rating for Value. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life received moderate ratings, indicating areas with room for improvement and further development. Professors are also well-regarded.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded profile, with exceptional performance noted in **Location** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4.20). **Internationality** also receives high marks (4.23). Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** (3.91) and **Accomodation** (3.83), which, while solid, are rated lower than other aspects. **Professors** and **Value** are also rated positively, hovering around the 4.0 to 4.1 mark.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also scores highly, suggesting a desirable setting. Conversely, the areas of **Accomodation** and **Student Life** show the lowest ratings, indicating room for improvement in these aspects. Facilities and Professors received solid, mid-range scores.
Most reviews (~74%) praise the rigorous, intellectually enriching academic experience and strong international atmosphere. Limited negative feedback (~5.1%) highlights workload intensity and administrative complexity.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With a 4.42 average rating from 33 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, highlighting enriching international experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A single negative review (~3%) cited restrictive Belgian policies and rising tuition.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight a comprehensive and up-to-date curriculum, practical real-life case studies, and strong international opportunities.
With ~93% of reviews being positive, students highlight excellent teachers, practical learning, and positive student-lecturer interaction. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With a 4.36/5 average rating from 11 reviews, ~91% are positive, highlighting a challenging yet rewarding curriculum, supportive people, and practical, career-focused education. A small ~9% of feedback mentioned issues with staff attitude and respect.
KU Leuven provides a rigorous academic experience with a strong international atmosphere. The programs are demanding but intellectually enriching, encouraging independent study. While administrative processes can be complex, the overall environment supports growth for motivated and self-driven students.
Nothing to show
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
Nothing to show
I study International Business Management at Artevelde University of Applied Sciences and overall I've had a positive experience. The programme has a strong practical focus—there's a real emphasis on case work, group projects, and applying theory to actual business situations rather than just memorising it. The international dimension is a highlight, with courses taught in English, a diverse student group, and opportunities for exchange and internships abroad. The professors are generally approachable and bring real-world business experience into the classroom, which makes the material more relevant. Campus facilities are modern and the support services are helpful. If I had to mention a downside, I'd recommend this programme to anyone looking for a hands-on, career-oriented business degree with a genuinely international outlook
Nothing to show
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
