United International Business Schools - UIBS vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs Antwerp Management School - AMS vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 120 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Practical, job-market focused programmes
- +Inspiring, industry-expert lecturers
- +International environment and connections
- +High quality education and knowledgeable professors
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities
- +High-quality Master of Finance program and valuable learning experiences.
- +Limited job placement assistance in Belgium for non-Dutch/French speakers.
- +Practical learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- +Strong theory-to-practice integration and practical application
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Engaging community activities and supportive environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Excessive academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement are prevalent.
- -Poor teaching quality and unfair grading practices.
- -Significant student attrition due to negative experiences.
- -Excessive administrative burden and inefficient management processes
- -Lack of modern technology and outdated facilities
- -Insufficient faculty support and unresponsive staff
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with an impressive 4.8. **Location** and **Value** also stand out at 4.32 and 4.47 respectively. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.74, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Facilities all received solid scores above 4.0.
An overview of these university ratings reveals strengths and areas for development. The institution excels in the quality of its professors, receiving the highest mark. Conversely, internationality stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other positively perceived areas include student life, value, and location, with facilities and accommodation also receiving solid scores.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring a 4. Areas like **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately well, with **Internationality** and **Value** also performing decently. The lowest score is for **Location**, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
Assessing the university's performance reveals a generally positive outlook. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation shows the weakest performance among the assessed categories, though it still scores well. Other areas like location, student life, and value are also rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded institution.
Overall, this institution receives a positive evaluation, with particularly strong scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated at approximately 4.3. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also received solid ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation** at around 3.7 and **Internationality**, which scored approximately 3.56.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Nearly all reviews are highly positive (~93%), praising the practical, job-market-focused curriculum, inspiring, industry-expert instructors, and international environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a high average rating of 3.92, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the global community, supportive staff, and quality education. One negative review mentioned academic pressure.
Two positive reviews highlight quality education and valuable program learning, with an average rating of 3.67/5. The primary recurring theme is the difficulty in finding employment in Belgium without Dutch or French proficiency.
Nearly all reviews are positive (~97%), highlighting practical learning, supportive faculty, and a welcoming, international environment. A few negative comments mentioned concerns with specific programs and scoring.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences is highly recommended, with ~89% of reviews being positive. Students praise well-structured lessons, practical application, and good facilities. Some minor areas for improvement include more teacher support during practical sessions.
Nothing to show
Frankly, KdG is the perfect option if you're looking for a practical university. As a student from the Applied Computer Science program, the thing I love the most is the perfect blend of theory and immediate exercises/projects which are designed to test that theory. It provides for a solid studying experience, which is more than satisfactory.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My time at Thomas More was a transformative experience that equipped me with the knowledge and skills to succeed in my career. The university's emphasis on practical learning and industry partnerships provided me with invaluable hands-on experience. The dedicated faculty and supportive staff fostered a stimulating learning environment, encouraging critical thinking and creativity. I am grateful for the opportunities to collaborate with talented peers and engage in meaningful projects. Thomas More instilled in me a strong work ethic, problem-solving abilities, and a lifelong passion for learning. I am proud to be an alumnus of such a prestigious institution and highly recommend it to anyone seeking a quality education that prepares them for future success. The only down side is the fees when it comes to international students, as it could be extremely expensive, and depending on your chosen course, you will encounter other unforseen expenses during the year.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences really nails that combo of theory and practical learning. Useful information is jam-packed into the courses, and the lab sessions are seriously awesome since we get to mess around with all kinds of aircraft and even helicopters. Plus, all the resources they give us really help us take what we learn in class and use it in the real world without any hassle. You know, some teachers like to let us figure things out ourselves, but most of them are super into explaining stuff and really good at it. All in all, VIVES is a great pick for anyone wanting hands-on, future-oriented learning.
