LUISS Business School vs Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2 vs Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Roma Tre - uniroma3
Side-by-side comparison from 133 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong career focus and job market alignment
- +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
- +International environment and practical application
- +Excellent career preparation and university reputation
- +Modern facilities and enriching academic/personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive environment, especially for international students
- +Industry connections and real-world application opportunities
- +Insightful and professionally active faculty
- +Diverse and global learning environment
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Engaging professors and academic excellence
- +Supportive campus services and resources
- +Practical learning experiences and internships
- +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
- +Competent and knowledgeable professors
- +Convenient telematics access
- +Structured learning and international community
- +Positive location and good opportunities
- -Poor organization and low-level course content.
- -Ineffective student coordination and support.
- -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
- -Speedy courses with a lack of depth and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor administrative support and unmotivated professors.
- -Dilapidated and lacking infrastructure.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Course content and offerings do not meet expectations.
- -Lack of support and professionalism from staff is a recurring theme.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
- -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective communication
This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.
Internationality and Professors are the university's strongest rated areas. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Value also demonstrate solid performance, while Location sits in the mid-range. The overall impression is one of a university excelling in academic and global aspects, with room for improvement in student housing.
An analysis of university ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring above 4.6. **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive favorable marks, indicating positive academic and social environments. **Facilities** and **Value** are well-regarded, though slightly lower than the top-tier categories. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, suggesting it may be a point for improvement.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
The university garners praise in several key areas, with professors and location both receiving the highest marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present the weakest aspects, scoring lower than other categories. The overall value proposition is rated positively, reflecting a balanced but uneven performance.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.
With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.
With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive programs, excellent preparation, and modern facilities. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns about rushed courses and lack of depth.
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, valuable industry connections, and insightful professors. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with diploma delivery, unprofessionalism, and unmet expectations.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive. Students commend professors' competence and teaching, engaging course content, and organized campus services. A small portion of feedback notes a theoretical approach in some fields.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.
Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.
The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.
The University of Rome tor Vergata is a great and relevantly young University, which is becoming each academic year stronger and more valuable. I graduated from the Global Governance bachelor's degree in English which presented a very interdisciplinary, interconnected and international programme to its students. It is focused on the great challenges and relevant matters of nowadays' world, which shape a strong basis for the next generations of workers and leaders of the upcoming years.
Participating in the Business Simulation Game as part of my MBA at Rome Business School was one of the most practical and impactful experiences of the program, It provided a realistic environment to test strategic decision making under pressure and highlighted the strong interdependence between market dynamics, operational performance, cost discipline, people management, pricing strategy and profitability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
