University of Münster - WWU vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs TU Dresden vs Hochschule Fresenius
Side-by-side comparison from 165 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible program options and interdisciplinary work
- +Helpful and accessible professors
- +Good organization and administrative support
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Excellent academic programs and intellectual challenge
- +Strong practical application and hands-on learning
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Excellent location and transport
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- -The education is too theoretical and outdated, lacking practical real-world application.
- -Focus on superficial academic aspects over practical relevance in thesis work.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Overloaded modules and excessive study hours detract from learning time.
- -Poor translation of lecture materials hinders understanding.
- -Inconsistent teaching with multiple professors per module creates confusion.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
This institution shows a well-rounded performance across various aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Accomodation** presents the weakest point, with a notably lower score compared to other categories. Other aspects like Student Life and Internationality are rated favorably, while Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a similar, moderate range.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Considering various aspects of the university experience, the location stands out with an exceptional rating. Facilities and value also received high marks, indicating strengths in these areas. Student life and accommodation were rated similarly positive. While professors and internationality were rated slightly lower, they still represent solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with particular excellence in its surroundings and practical resources.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
A comprehensive review reveals a generally strong performance across various university aspects. The location stands out as the highest-rated area, indicating a particularly advantageous setting. While most categories, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value, received excellent scores, internationality emerged as the comparatively weakest, though still a respectable 4. This suggests a positive overall experience with room for growth in global engagement.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors and program flexibility. A small percentage (~10%) express concerns about outdated or overly theoretical course content. The average rating is 4.1/5.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% are positive, highlighting excellent programs, engaging learning, and good facilities. A small ~8% of feedback was negative, citing demanding workloads and translation issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight good location, helpful staff, and practical, industry-focused education. Dining facilities and class sizes are also praised.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Studied in WWU Münster in IS. The education is far from a practical field, the courses are too theoretical and far from a real business perspective. Most of the lectures are outdated and boring. Professors and Ph.ds stress mostly about how do you write the exposé, which synonyms do you use but don't give any clue about how your thesis can be applied in the real world. So, be prepared for constant iterations of changing your master thesis with different wording. If you want to finish your studies in 2 years, prepare yourself for studying only. In my humble opinion, the university is over ranked and it's too conservative. Won't recommend to internationals or germans with head on their shoulders. Also, if you want to get your degree, prepare to wait for almost 2 months. The university is so "progressive", that they will provide you a piece of paper within 2 months, not earlier (already advise them to use docusign or similar software, but they are too lazy and lame).... If you want to get a student wohnheim room - prepare to spend a lot of time in "Studierendenwerk", where they don't want to give good apartments/rooms in the first meet. They even won't speak English with you.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
