University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs Prague University of Economics and Business - VSE vs University College of Business in Prague vs Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT vs University of Finance and Administration - VSFS
Side-by-side comparison from 150 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
- +strong career focus and employability
- +industry professional instructors and valuable networking opportunities
- +well-structured curriculum with clear expectations
Nothing to show
- +Expert faculty & modern, practical curriculum
- +Strong career support & global recognition
- +Well-regarded technical programs
- +Expert faculty with practical experience and supportive teaching
- +Tailored learning with individual approach and flexible course options
- +Modern campus environment and relevant, job-market-ready programs
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +International and vibrant student environment
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical learning and skill development
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Rote memorization over critical thinking and practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect score. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation** also received exceptionally high marks. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated very well, indicating a positive overall experience. The **Value** proposition is also strong, reflecting well on the university's offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.46. Professors, student life, and overall value are also well-regarded, all receiving a consistent 4.31. Internationality sits at a solid 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.85, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution receives strong marks for its academic staff, with professors rated highly at 4.67. Facilities, student life, accommodation, and overall value are all well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. The university also benefits from a convenient location and good accommodation options, both receiving 4.5 stars. Its weakest area is internationality, which, at 3.67, is notably lower than other assessed aspects.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
Considerable strengths are evident in the university's location and student life, both receiving high marks. Internationality and professors also score very favorably. The facilities and value for money are well-regarded, demonstrating a generally positive student experience. Accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting career focus and employer reputation. A small portion (around 14%) notes a memorization-heavy approach rather than critical thinking.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, useful projects, and career help, noting high-quality, modern education and opportunities for internships and jobs.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight excellent academics, supportive teachers, and a friendly environment, with one mentioning a personalized approach and innovative practices.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 74 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight the international environment and helpful professors as key strengths. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
At this university, you need to memorize tons of information - most of it you will never ever use + you will forget it right after the exam. Students are not encouraged to use their brains and to come up with their own solutions, but to just absorb the information the teacher gives them. I got As and Bs but haven't learn almost anything.
Nothing to show
Firstly, I would like to mention that CVUT is one of the best unis in Czech Republic. After graduating it gives a plenty of opportunities to work since its certificate is recognised around the world in huge companies. It’s not a secret that not all of the students can work while studying, it’s quite difficult to study there but it worth it. Inside, every faculty’s building is modern. Especially FIT, where I am studying now looks great. Professors and tutors create opportunity to study, they can answer to all your questions if there are. Secondly, getting to the uni is not that difficult even if you live far from it. Transportation in public is so developed and trams can get you anywhere quickly. For instance, I am living in Prague 3 and uni is located in Prague 6, even though in map it the distance could be seen so far, by using tram I get to the uni in 20-30 minutes. To sum up, it can be difficult to study there and subject can be hard too but it worth it since after it creates you a huge opportunity to work in successful companies without any doubt.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
