University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs Prague University of Economics and Business - VSE vs TC Business School vs Anglo-American University - AAU
Side-by-side comparison from 147 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, industry-experienced professors and supportive mentors
- +Challenging curriculum fostering critical thinking and real-world skills
- +Diverse international environment and small class sizes
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
- +strong career focus and employability
- +industry professional instructors and valuable networking opportunities
- +well-structured curriculum with clear expectations
Nothing to show
- +International and vibrant student environment
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical learning and skill development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Rote memorization over critical thinking and practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also highly rated, both scoring above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.92, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect compared to other university offerings.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect score. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation** also received exceptionally high marks. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated very well, indicating a positive overall experience. The **Value** proposition is also strong, reflecting well on the university's offerings.
Nothing to show
Considerable strengths are evident in the university's location and student life, both receiving high marks. Internationality and professors also score very favorably. The facilities and value for money are well-regarded, demonstrating a generally positive student experience. Accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 55 reviews are positive, with students highlighting excellent teachers, challenging curricula, and a diverse international environment. An average rating of 4.71 reflects strong satisfaction.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting career focus and employer reputation. A small portion (around 14%) notes a memorization-heavy approach rather than critical thinking.
Nothing to show
All 74 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight the international environment and helpful professors as key strengths. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
At this university, you need to memorize tons of information - most of it you will never ever use + you will forget it right after the exam. Students are not encouraged to use their brains and to come up with their own solutions, but to just absorb the information the teacher gives them. I got As and Bs but haven't learn almost anything.
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
