University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Simon Business School vs University of Rochester vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT

Side-by-side comparison from 112 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of New York in Prague - UNYP (4.70)
University of New York in Prague - UNYP: wins 3/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Simon Business School: wins 0/7 categories
University of Rochester: wins 0/7 categories
Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT: wins 1/7 categories
St. John Fisher College: wins 2/7 categories
University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry - FBF: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Psychology
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Rochester, New York, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Rochester, New York, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Rochester, New York, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Biology
Rochester, New York, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Pharmaceutical-Biochemical Sciences - PhD
Category ratings
Facilities
4.24
4.13
Not rated
3.80
4.24
4.50
Win
3.00
Location
4.90
Win
3.75
Not rated
2.70
3.89
3.50
4.00
Professors
4.42
4.13
Not rated
4.00
4.38
4.50
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.68
Win
4.13
Not rated
4.30
4.36
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.51
Win
3.63
Not rated
3.60
4.31
3.00
4.00
Value
4.34
4.13
Not rated
3.90
4.10
4.50
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.95
3.57
Not rated
3.80
4.03
Win
3.50
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
  • +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
  • +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong faculty knowledge and approachable professors
  • +Diverse and friendly student community with ample extracurriculars
  • +Excellent student resources and research opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
  • +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
  • +High-quality educational programs
  • +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
  • +Strong scientific foundations and practical learning
  • +Supportive environment with approachable professors and well-equipped labs
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional development through student associations
Cons
  • -Overpriced tuition and fees.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Unresponsive administration and management.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are seen as inconsistent and lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course relevance leads to boredom.
Rating summary
What students say

The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

Nothing to show

This institution garners high marks for its **Internationality**, receiving an impressive 4.3. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0, with strong scores for Facilities and Accommodation (both 3.8), and a solid 3.9 for Value. Student Life also scores well at 3.6. The primary area for improvement identified is Location, which received a lower rating of 2.7.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.

Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong offering, particularly excelling in **Value**, where it achieved a perfect score. Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received commendable ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified were Facilities and Internationality, both scoring a 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.1/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting course connection, research evidence, diverse friends, and helpful professors. Limited negative feedback (~0%) was noted regarding advisors and conflicting information.

With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.

Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.

Students highly praise the faculty, highlighting valuable professional and personal experiences (~100% positive). Recurring themes include strong scientific foundations, practical work, approachable professors, and supportive community.

Rating distribution
5★
68%
38%
0%
30%
21%
50%
33%
4★
32%
38%
0%
50%
77%
50%
67%
3★
0%
13%
0%
20%
3%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great University Experience!

I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close