Panthéon-Assas University vs IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Deusto Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 464 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Deusto Business School (5.00)
Panthéon-Assas University: wins 0/7 categories
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 4/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Deusto Business School: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Master's Degree in Finance
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
2.83
4.09
4.22
Win
4.21
Not rated
3.43
3.83
Location
4.00
4.29
4.66
4.24
Not rated
4.64
4.92
Win
Professors
3.57
4.28
4.12
4.41
Not rated
3.86
4.58
Win
Internationality
3.00
4.55
4.63
4.35
Not rated
4.50
4.92
Win
Student life
3.29
4.25
4.30
Win
4.10
Not rated
4.07
4.08
Value
3.71
4.31
4.49
Win
4.03
Not rated
3.64
4.17
Accommodation
3.00
3.78
4.00
Win
3.56
1.00
2.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Renowned reputation and career opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and engaged administration
  • +Vibrant community and enriching student life
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international community and global opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and active student associations
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +High academic standards and professional faculty
  • +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
  • +Rigorous and structured learning environment
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Lack of teaching and irrelevant course content.
  • -Exploitative commercial practices regarding course materials.
  • -Generally low quality of education.
  • -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

When evaluating this institution, its location stands out with a perfect score, marking its strongest attribute. Conversely, facilities received the lowest rating. Other aspects like professors, student life, and value present a mixed but generally positive picture, with accommodation, internationality, and student life falling in the mid-range.

This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting the university's renown, strong student community, and supportive staff. ~13% of feedback is negative, criticizing the quality of distant learning and teaching.

With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
49%
63%
49%
200%
21%
67%
4★
38%
44%
27%
42%
0%
50%
25%
3★
13%
9%
10%
7%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
8%
1★
13%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close