London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Surrey vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Essex vs Surrey Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 648 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
- +Accessible course materials and online resources
- +Positive campus life and amenities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment, diverse community
- +Knowledgeable, approachable, and committed faculty/lecturers
- +Diverse programs and intuitive learning platform
- +Strong academic programmes and career support
- +Supportive and connected community
- +Excellent employability outcomes and internship opportunities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +Practical, industry-focused education and connections
- +Diverse contemporary music programs and courses
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Policies seem to favor certain student groups.
- -Negative campus culture is a concern.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Inadequate support and unclear expectations from some faculty.
- -Poor campus facilities and remote location with transport issues.
- -Unfair feedback and marking practices.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning opportunities.
- -Limited career support and industry connections fail to prepare graduates.
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors also receive high marks, indicating a strong academic environment. Student life, location, and internationality are all rated very favorably, suggesting a well-rounded and appealing university experience. Accommodation is the lowest-rated category but still scores very well. Overall, the university offers a strong value proposition across its various aspects.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
With exceptional ratings in Facilities and Internationality, this institution demonstrates significant strengths in its physical resources and global outlook. Student Life and Value also received positive marks, indicating a well-rounded experience and good return on investment. Conversely, Location and Accommodations were rated somewhat lower, suggesting these areas may offer room for improvement compared to other aspects of the university.
This institution demonstrates a very strong performance across nearly all aspects, with particular excellence noted in Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring exceptionally high. Student Life and Professors also receive commendable ratings. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value, indicating room for improvement in that specific domain compared to its other strengths.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
This institution shows a mixed performance according to recent ratings. Its strongest areas are **Student Life** (3.0), followed by **Internationality** (2.5). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.0) and **Value** (2.25) represent the weakest aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Location all received a middling 2.75.
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
With an average rating of 4.79/5 from 218 reviews, 99.5% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable tutors, accessible online course content, and the campus environment. A single negative review cited concerns about management and policies.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
The University of Essex receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~98.5% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight a welcoming environment, quality teaching, and supportive faculty. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned issues with location and transport.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 25 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent programs, impactful professors, and strong career outcomes, including high employability. No negative feedback was recorded.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
University student reviews are mixed, with an average rating of 3/5. While one review is positive, another 25% expressed negative sentiment.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I just saw this link on the Surrey alumnis page. I thought it was really cool to have the opportunity to share my experience. Congratulations Eduopinions for the work. I studied in Surrey a few years ago, I graduated in 2000 and I think the university has changed a lot since then. However, I can say that I loved studying in Surrey and that my daughter is now studying there too!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
