London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Ulster University vs Brunel Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 433 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
University of the West of Scotland - UWS: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 5/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 0/7 categories
Brunel Business School: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/7 categories
Avado: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Human Resource Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.16
4.44
Win
4.07
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.78
Win
3.84
4.74
4.14
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.42
4.75
Win
4.38
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.29
4.60
4.09
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.65
3.48
4.56
Win
3.94
4.08
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.10
4.50
Win
4.28
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
3.40
4.32
Win
3.59
3.79
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities
  • +Applied learning and relevant coursework
  • +Strong employability and career support
  • +Flexible schedules and learning resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Lack of academic and administrative support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
  • -Insufficient time for major projects.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
  • -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
  • -Lack of modern resources and support.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
39%
75%
56%
71%
0%
0%
4★
44%
36%
25%
31%
21%
0%
0%
3★
18%
21%
0%
10%
7%
0%
0%
2★
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

More programme coordination

The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close