The University of Manchester vs Manchester Metropolitan University vs The University of Law Business School vs University of Bolton vs General Assembly
Side-by-side comparison from 484 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging courses and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers
- +Diverse community and vibrant social/student life
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Engaging courses with practical application
- +Supportive and friendly lecturers
- +Vibrant campus and social activities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +Passionate and supportive lecturers
- +Good course content and practical learning
- +Excellent facilities and campus environment
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and friendly staff and tutors.
- +Positive social environment and making friends.
- +Engaging and beneficial course content.
- -Outdated facilities and poor course organization.
- -Lecturers not providing relevant course content or addressing student feedback.
- -Unrealistic promises of experience and difficulty reaching professors.
- -Poor quality teaching and unclear assignments.
- -Lack of support from staff and unfair grading.
- -Suboptimal learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and communication problems cause frustration.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of personalized attention hinder learning.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Course content and career relevance are misleading.
- -Poorly managed administrative issues.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** (4.52) and **Internationality** (4.55), suggesting a vibrant and globally connected environment. **Student Life** also scores well at 4.39. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.67, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Regarding university ratings, **Location** stands out as the strongest area, boasting a score of 4.67. **Facilities** also scored very highly at 4.56, followed closely by **Student Life** at 4.49. **Accomodation**, however, emerged as the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.94. Other areas like **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** received solid mid-range scores, generally above 4.2.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
Performance is notably strong in Facilities, achieving a rating of 4.41. Value and Location also received high marks, at 4.32 and 4.24 respectively. Student Life and Internationality are rated solidly, around 4.09 and 3.91. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, at 3.55.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
Nothing to show
Facilities stand out as the university's highest-rated aspect, followed closely by professors, location, and student life, all receiving strong marks. Accommodations also score well. However, internationality and value for money are the areas with the lowest ratings, suggesting room for improvement in these categories.
With a 4.25/5 average rating from 315 reviews, ~86% are positive. Students praise challenging courses, supportive lecturers, diverse communities, and engaging campus life. Very minimal negative feedback ( ~1.3%) was noted.
With an average rating of 4.39/5 from 131 reviews, approximately 89% of students praise good courses and helpful teaching. A small number, around 1.5%, mention unhelpful tutors or questionable assignments.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~90% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and good learning experiences tailored to industry standards. There is minimal negative feedback.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
University feedback is largely positive (~74% of reviews), with students praising supportive staff and a friendly atmosphere. A small percentage of negative feedback (~9%) mentions concerns about course relevance.
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
I thoroughly love my university. They are so helpful with any problem or situation. Great location and everyone is lovely Always wants the best for students and the facilities are fantastic. They use an app called moodle so you can access lectures PowerPoint slides coursework exams the lot. Student hubs are available across campus to talk to people about any issues you have wether it’s financial issues to mental health issues. Some buildings possibly good be re built/ re decorated to be modernised.
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
