EU Business School vs SKEMA Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs MIB Trieste School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 549 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
EU Business School: wins 0/6 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/6 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/6 categories
MIB Trieste School of Management: wins 1/6 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 4/6 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: MBA in International Business
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.21
4.13
3.71
4.63
4.67
Win
4.57
Location
4.73
4.23
3.75
4.21
4.74
5.00
Win
4.29
Professors
4.04
4.39
4.13
4.08
4.67
4.33
4.86
Win
Internationality
4.72
4.40
4.13
4.14
4.60
5.00
Win
4.43
Student life
4.22
4.14
3.63
3.87
4.71
Win
4.33
4.43
Value
3.87
4.07
4.13
4.18
4.69
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.42
3.59
3.57
3.19
4.46
5.00
Win
4.17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Well-designed, interdisciplinary courses and knowledgeable professors
  • +Engaging, real-world learning and diverse international student body
  • +Organized university with good campus facilities
  • +Expert professors, practical curriculum, and networking opportunities.
  • +Supportive community and career integration support.
  • +Beautiful location and enriching overall experience.
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and unresponsiveness.
  • -Lack of course structure, insufficient depth, and program inconsistency.
  • -Limited student support and disregard for student concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support for students are recurring complaints.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.21. **Internationality** (4.14) and **Value** (4.18) also received strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.19. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Student Life fall within a moderate to good range, reflecting a generally positive but uneven performance.

This institution achieves strong overall scores, with location and student life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas. The university also garners high marks for its professors and value for money. Among the evaluated aspects, accommodation received the lowest, though still respectable, rating. Internationality and facilities also scored favorably.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

With ~74% of 77 reviews being positive, students praised organized courses and engaging learning experiences. A small minority, ~6.5%, reported poor organization and communication issues. The average rating is 4.13/5.

All 42 student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.81/5. Students praise knowledgeable professors, practical curriculum, and excellent networking opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
50%
38%
47%
81%
100%
86%
4★
45%
42%
38%
29%
19%
0%
14%
3★
21%
7%
13%
18%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
1%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
1%
13%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

Solid program and international atmosphere

The program at MIB Trieste School of Management allowed me to acquire solid management skills in an international context. The courses are well-structured, focused on practice and group projects. I particularly appreciated the cultural diversity and the interaction with students from all over the world. I recommend this school to those looking for an enriching and professional learning experience. The organization could be improved at times, but overall, the experience was very positive.

Nothing to show

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close