EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona vs Johan Cruyff Institute
Side-by-side comparison from 344 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world business education
- +Diverse, international student community
- +Opportunities for networking and career development
- +Knowledgeable and engaged professors
- +Diverse international student community
- +Well-structured assignments and accessible digital tools
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Diverse academic and extracurricular opportunities
- +Exceptional faculty and modern facilities
- +Welcoming and supportive campus atmosphere
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Disorganization and administrative issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality, staff helpfulness, and facilities are subpar.
- -The institution prioritizes profit over genuine educational support and accreditation.
- -Poor program quality and low educational standards.
- -Ineffective administration and lack of student support.
- -Disorganized operations and failure to meet promised internship assistance.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources create significant difficulties.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This university shows particularly strong performance in its location and internationality, both receiving high scores. Student life and facilities also stand out positively. However, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other aspects. The value and professor ratings fall in the mid-range, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these categories.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a high score of 4.54. **Professors** and **Location** also received strong ratings, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.95. **Facilities** and **Student Life** received moderate scores, around 3.5. The **Value** rating sits at a respectable 3.88.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with Student Life and Professors standing out as its strongest points. Location and Accommodations also receive positive feedback. However, Internationality presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower rating compared to other aspects. The university offers a generally positive experience, with facilities and value ratings falling in the mid-range.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and networking. Approximately 8% are negative, citing disorganization, basic education, and unhelpful staff.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors and a diverse, engaging learning environment. A small portion of feedback (~10.7%) raises concerns about program utility and organizational support.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
With an average rating of 4.54/5 from 41 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive. Recurring themes include a wide range of academic opportunities and student groups, as well as a stunning campus with accessible resources.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
My program here has many outstanding aspects, but one that stands out is the quality of the faculty. They are not only experienced professionals but also active researchers. Their expertise and insights make the program even stronger, especially because they are thorough and ensure each student grasps the material.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
Nothing to show
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
