EU Business School vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs University of Rostock
Side-by-side comparison from 413 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive staff and strong student-staff relationships
- +International environment and diverse community
- +Practical curriculum and interactive classes
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Practical, experience-based learning and engaging professors.
- +Supportive staff and interactive, interesting classes.
- +Opportunities for cultural immersion and international connections.
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Practical, market-aligned programs with excellent course design and simulations.
- +Supportive academic environment with knowledgeable and approachable professors.
- +Strong research opportunities, often with modern equipment and industry connections.
- +Excellent, helpful professors
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Convenient location for travel
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality and facilities are subpar.
- -Extracurricular activities and career support are neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Facilities are described as terrible and outdated.
- -Lack of genuine help and feeling exploited for money are recurring themes.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Nationality-based grading bias and lack of project support for international students.
- -Outdated course content and professors with limited knowledge.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unresponsive faculty create problems.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.7. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive feedback, averaging above 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating. **Professors** and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores, indicating satisfactory but not outstanding performance in these aspects.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas, with **Professors, Student Life, and Internationality** all receiving top marks, closely followed by Facilities. The university's **Accommodation** emerges as its weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Value for money is also rated positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
The university garners strong approval, particularly in the realm of its professors, who received the highest marks. Student life and location also scored very well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. While accommodation received a solid rating, internationality emerged as the lowest-rated category among the surveyed aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a favorable performance with room for enhancement in its global engagement.
This institution garners high marks for its academic offerings, with professors receiving a notable 4.3 rating. Student life and accommodation also score well, both at 3.5. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.95. Facilities and location also received mid-range scores, while value for money was rated a respectable 3.8.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff and international environments. Around 7% of feedback is negative, with minor concerns about organization and academic challenge.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 22 reviews, ~82% are positive, praising project-based learning, professors' real-world experience, and student interactions. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentioned issues with office support and perceived cost-driven practices.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
Nearly all student reviews are positive, highlighting practical courses, modern facilities, and approachable professors. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions outdated course content and perceived grading bias.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 and ~0% negative feedback, student reviews are predominantly positive. Students highlight the English-taught Social Sciences program, helpful professors, and convenient location.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
I'm thrilled to share my experience at EU Business School. The professors are industry experts who bring real-world insights to the classroom. The classes are interactive and engaging, with a focus on practical applications. I've achieved amazing things, including internships, networking opportunities, and launching my own business project. The campus life is vibrant, with a diverse community of students from around the world. Overall, EU Business School has given me the skills, confidence, and network to pursue my entrepreneurial dreams. I highly recommend it to anyone seeking a business education that truly prepares you for the real worldworld.
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
