International School of Management vs Hochschule Fresenius vs The New School vs Columbia University vs General Assembly
Side-by-side comparison from 99 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Personalized, adaptable programs and learning
- +Supportive, engaging faculty and staff
- +Vibrant city environment with opportunities
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Diverse and thoughtful food options
- +Affordable and accessible accommodation
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- +Welcoming campus atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Diverse student body and international student presence
- +Affordable tuition and good campus facilities
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and networking opportunities are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear course expectations are common complaints.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. **Professors** are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately, while **Value** sits in a similar range.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in **Value** (5 out of 5), with equally strong performances in **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** (all 4 out of 5). Its weakest areas are **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a rating of 3 out of 5.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting fulfilling academic experiences and strong communities. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates positive campus vibes, a strong sense of community, and enjoyable activities. Most professors are well-regarded, and the diversity of students is appreciated.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
Nothing to show
