Babes-Bolyai University - UBB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 142 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse academic programs and international opportunities
- +Engaged, knowledgeable, and practice-oriented professors
- +Modern facilities and supportive social environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
- +Passionate professors and clear explanations
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Effort-based learning and supplemental resources
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -poor communication
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create a difficult learning environment.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and irrelevant course material are common complaints.
This university demonstrates a strong reputation, particularly excelling in **Location** with a rating of 4.48 and **Student Life** at 4.35. Professors also receive favorable marks at 4.14, alongside a good **Value** score of 4.16. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.51, with **Facilities** and **Internationality** also rated moderately.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **professors (5/5)** and **internationality (5/5)**, along with excellent **value (5/5)**. Facilities, location, and accommodation also receive solid ratings of 4/5. The area with the lowest score is **student life (3/5)**, suggesting room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.
The university is highly praised for its diverse academic programs and interactive learning with well-trained, open professors. Students appreciate international opportunities and modern facilities. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, this university garners highly positive reviews. Students praise the solid program foundation, passionate professors, and relevant curriculum. Practical work is available, encouraging self-driven skill development.
As a student you have high expectations of the teachers - they should be role models and inspire you to learn, be active and have progress. There are some teachers that are the opposite: full of themselves, over-dressed and tona of make-up, looking from somewhere above to all the mortal people that are not like them. Ms Ciot is one of them and students see that she acts superior, she speaks superior and we don't need this. No matter if you are rich or poor, smart or not so smart - you cannot have this attitude - she needs to change or the management needs to take action. We think these people should not be allowed to teach to students - as the country does not need more Ms Ciot Gabriela for sure. Other than this - I feel I can learn - great university and great atmosphere - great covid policy enjoyed it even during hard times - thanks!
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show