Babes-Bolyai University - UBB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 140 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse academic programs and international opportunities
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Modern facilities and a vibrant social atmosphere
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum balancing theory and practical application
- +Excellent career opportunities and professional development
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
- +Passionate professors and clear explanations
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Effort-based learning and supplemental resources
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
- -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student-centered focus and administrative neglect.
- -Poor value for money with a perception of a profit-driven institution.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create a difficult learning environment.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and irrelevant course material are common complaints.
Performance metrics reveal a university with notable strengths in key areas. Location and student life are highly rated at 4.46 and 4.33 respectively, with value also scoring well at 4.23. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.14. The weakest areas identified are accommodations, rated at 3.50, and internationality at 3.75. Facilities received a rating of 3.88.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.61, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.38. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3.78. Other assessed aspects like Professors (3.88), Accomodation (4.07), Value (4.04), and Internationality (3.79) fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **professors (5/5)** and **internationality (5/5)**, along with excellent **value (5/5)**. Facilities, location, and accommodation also receive solid ratings of 4/5. The area with the lowest score is **student life (3/5)**, suggesting room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.
University reviews highlight diverse programs (~74%), well-trained and engaging professors encouraging critical thinking, and excellent international collaboration opportunities. Facilities are modern and well-maintained, with a positive academic and social experience.
Approximately 74% of 95 reviews are positive, citing structured curricula, knowledgeable professors, and good professional opportunities. A small portion (around 2%) expressed concerns about outdated facilities and perceived institutional priorities.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, this university garners highly positive reviews. Students praise the solid program foundation, passionate professors, and relevant curriculum. Practical work is available, encouraging self-driven skill development.
As a student you have high expectations of the teachers - they should be role models and inspire you to learn, be active and have progress. There are some teachers that are the opposite: full of themselves, over-dressed and tona of make-up, looking from somewhere above to all the mortal people that are not like them. Ms Ciot is one of them and students see that she acts superior, she speaks superior and we don't need this. No matter if you are rich or poor, smart or not so smart - you cannot have this attitude - she needs to change or the management needs to take action. We think these people should not be allowed to teach to students - as the country does not need more Ms Ciot Gabriela for sure. Other than this - I feel I can learn - great university and great atmosphere - great covid policy enjoyed it even during hard times - thanks!
Last year I chose ASE with a pinch of salt, because many of my acquaintances told me from their experience that it is a university where neither the teachers, nor the students are involved in their work. That couldn't be farther from the truth, at least for the German Business Administration faculty where I study. The students here are, though sometimes lazy, really creative and with a desire to put into practice the information that they get from the courses. The professors are really great at sharing their beliefs about different topics and they also put the student in some mind-blowing scenarios, where they really have to activate their brains to come up with a sensible answer. I remember with pleasure how we did unique role-play games during macroeconomics classes, games which made me come to a better understanding of how the market works. I also had quite an annoying experience that I'm going to share with you. It's about the marketing teacher whose courses I attended during the second semester. This person contradicted himself a lot of times and that made him look like he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. In addition to this, he used to mock the students who answered incorrectly to his questions, without even providing himself the right answer in the end. All in all, the entire collective of both students and teachers is welcoming and here at ASE can truly be achieved long-lasting friendships. It's an underrated faculty that I definitely recommend to all the people that are interested in studying smartly.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
