University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Transilvania University of Brasov - TUB vs Romanian-American University vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS
Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Supportive professors and valuable learning experiences
- +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities
- +Beautiful city with many attractions and student benefits
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Flexible distance learning and accessible study resources
- +Good teachers and interactive courses
- +Convenient location and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Useless courses and poor teaching quality.
- -Lack of support and poor treatment for international students.
- -Uninspired and unhelpful faculty.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -Ineffective communication and poor administrative support from the school.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources for learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum content.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
With a location rating of 4.875, this institution excels in its surroundings. Key strengths also lie in its professors (3.889) and student life (3.778), alongside good value (3.778). Accommodations, rated at 3.444, represent the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and internationality both received moderate scores of 3.667.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution receives a commendable average rating, with its **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.2. **Professors** also scored highly at 4.0. Conversely, **Internationality** presented the weakest area with a rating of 3.2. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accommodation fall within a similar mid-range, with Student Life also slightly lower.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Approximately 64% of reviews are positive, highlighting good study programs, campus life, and the city. Two negative reviews (18.2%) mention useless courses and poor teaching, with one noting issues for international students.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight accessible distance learning and flexible scheduling. Some note decent academic quality and good teachers, though it's not considered the absolute best.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
