Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs Concordia University vs HEC Montreal vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Academy of Aeronautics
Side-by-side comparison from 206 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Approachable and qualified professors with effective teaching methods.
- +Practical, career-focused learning and development of useful skills.
- +Strong student support and integration for international students.
- +Welcoming and supportive professors
- +Practical and relevant programs for career development
- +Positive and inclusive campus environment
- +Diverse and well-rounded program offerings
- +Strong career preparation and job market focus
- +Engaging professors and ample student opportunities
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
Nothing to show
- +Effective teaching and supportive professors
- +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
- +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Lack of support and poor communication from the university.
- -Poor teaching quality and inaccessible good instructors.
- -Ineffective and error-prone exams.
- -Unsupportive administrative and management practices.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There is significant dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
- -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
- -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Among surveyed categories, this institution excels in **Location** with a rating of 4.6, followed closely by **Professors** at 4.28 and **Student Life** at 4.24. The **Value** for money emerges as the comparatively weaker area, scoring 3.83. Ratings for Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality are all solid, falling between 3.9 and 4.1.
This university demonstrates a strong performance across several key areas. Location and Internationality stand out with particularly high ratings, indicating excellent accessibility and a diverse environment. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score, suggesting it is the weakest area. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably, while Professors also maintain a solid score.
This university exhibits a strong performance across most surveyed areas. Student life stands out as its highest-rated aspect, closely followed by value and facilities. Accommodation and location, while still positive, represent the university's comparatively weaker areas, though all ratings remain robust. Internationality and professors also received favorable scores.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Nothing to show
This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4.32 average rating, nearly all (~95%) of 19 reviews are positive. Students praise approachable, qualified professors and enjoyable, practical teaching methods. One review noted a lack of support.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting a friendly campus environment, knowledgeable and supportive professors, and a rewarding educational experience. A small percentage of feedback noted issues with some teachers' communication and exam quality.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 18 reviews, ~83% highlight diverse management and social programs, intimate class sizes with professor interaction, and numerous student events and scholarships. Some mention career focus and unique degree paths.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Nothing to show
Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.
Nothing to show
