EADA Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 361 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and relevant, up-to-date content
- +Enriching multicultural environment and diverse peer network
- +Practical application of knowledge and real-world focus
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Supportive, intense, and up-to-date academic programs with practical application
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth beyond academics, including leadership and diverse experiences
- +Strong career support, excellent placements, and networking opportunities
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- +Excellent facilities and creative space
- +Access to industry professionals and top restaurants
- +Comprehensive administrative and career-focused curriculum
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Lack of essential program components
- -Arbitrary grading and inflexibility
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor handling of financial matters and logistical challenges.
- -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Negative social environment and perceived unfair financial practices.
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and resources for students is frequently mentioned.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, excelling notably in **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very strong ratings. The university's weakest area, according to this data, is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are all rated favorably.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
Performance across key university metrics shows varied strengths. Professors receive the highest marks, followed closely by value and internationality. Student life and location also score well. The university's weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, though both still achieve respectable scores.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This institution presents a well-rounded academic and student experience. Its strongest points are the excellent location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. While all other areas are rated highly at a 4 out of 5, there are no significant weaknesses to report. Facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all contribute to a positive overall impression.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising academic quality, professors, and the international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) notes administrative issues or curriculum shortcomings.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, a supportive environment, and practical learning opportunities. The remaining ~8% of feedback mentions concerns about value and IT infrastructure.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent equipment and creative space. They also appreciate professional classes and valuable administrative knowledge for culinary careers.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
