EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona vs Johan Cruyff Institute

Side-by-side comparison from 430 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Neuro Business School - NBS (5.00)
EADA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 0/7 categories
UIC Barcelona: wins 0/7 categories
Johan Cruyff Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC: wins 0/7 categories
Neuro Business School - NBS: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
4.50
Read more reviews
127 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelors in Business Administration
Barcelona, Spain
3.80
Read more reviews
221 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Barcelona, Spain
4.20
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: University Bachelor’s Degree in Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Sport Management
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: BA in NeuroMarketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.53
4.04
4.17
4.09
4.43
3.11
5.00
Win
Location
4.95
4.70
4.00
3.90
4.00
3.89
5.00
Win
Professors
4.53
3.97
4.00
4.27
4.71
3.75
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.80
4.68
3.83
3.82
4.71
3.79
5.00
Win
Student life
4.61
4.18
4.17
3.82
4.29
2.67
5.00
Win
Value
4.49
3.86
4.17
3.91
4.79
3.79
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.18
3.48
4.60
3.33
4.21
3.13
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and interactive learning environment
  • +Career impact and professional development opportunities
  • +Transformative personal growth and future clarification
  • +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
  • +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
  • +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
  • +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
  • +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
  • +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
  • +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
  • +Flexible online learning and self-paced study
  • +High-quality teaching materials and organized virtual platform
  • +Accessible and supportive professors and tutors
  • +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
  • +Expert instructors and supportive staff
  • +Practical application and industry connections
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant inconvenience.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of promised program focus are disappointing.
  • -Lack of flexibility and arbitrary grading create a poor learning experience.
  • -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
  • -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
  • -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
  • -Poor management and unqualified staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
  • -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause significant problems.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful customer service frustrates students.
  • -Poorly organized and user-unfriendly online platforms hinder access to information.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with location emerging as its standout feature, achieving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality also received highly favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation represents the area with the lowest score among the surveyed categories.

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.

This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.

The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.

Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.

A well-rounded university experience is indicated by these ratings. The strongest aspects are the **Location** (3.89) and **Internationality/Value** (both 3.79), suggesting a desirable and globally recognized institution with good perceived worth. **Student Life** (2.67) received the lowest score, pointing to an area that could be improved. Other areas like Professors, Facilities, and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.48/5 from 126 reviews, ~97.6% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise transformative programs, excellent teachers, and valuable career opportunities. A small percentage of negative reviews mention issues with administration and program delivery.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.

Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.

With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.

University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.

~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting a robust virtual campus, flexible online model, and continuous assessment. A small percentage (~10%) of negative feedback mentions administrative errors and poor customer service.

All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
24%
71%
50%
85%
39%
150%
4★
39%
46%
0%
36%
15%
39%
0%
3★
2%
22%
14%
7%
4%
13%
0%
2★
2%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
4%
14%
7%
4%
10%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My Experience at EADA - MSc. Fintech

From a purely academic perspective, the experience is great. The professors are super good and the small class sizes really make the learning experience very personalised. The program has been carefully curated to be relevant and is very practical - I feel like I am learning things I would actually use in my professional career. Apart from this, the students come from really different backgrounds and cultures and it really helps you learn more about how things are different in other countries. Overall, it's been a fantastic experience so far and I highly recommend it!

Professor and teaching style

Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.

Nothing to show

ADE Course

Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.

A life-changing experience in Sports Industry

A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.

Good online option

I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.

The attitude and the atmosphere

The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close