EADA Business School vs Euncet Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO
Side-by-side comparison from 569 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and relevant, up-to-date content
- +Enriching multicultural environment and diverse peer network
- +Practical application of knowledge and real-world focus
- +High-quality teaching and attentive, experienced professors
- +Strong focus on professional application of knowledge
- +Positive and supportive learning environment
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Practical approach and industry experience of lecturers.
- +Close, personal relationships with professors who care about student development.
- +Relevant and forward-looking programmes like Business Intelligence and Data Analytics.
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Applied neuroscience for business and marketing
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Clear, interesting, and globally-focused programs
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Lack of essential program components
- -Arbitrary grading and inflexibility
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient student support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Poor management and unprofessional staff.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum are criticized.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, excelling notably in **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very strong ratings. The university's weakest area, according to this data, is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are all rated favorably.
Exceptional performance marks this institution's review, with perfect scores awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Facilities stand out as a strong area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Overall, the university demonstrates outstanding strengths across nearly all evaluated aspects.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
This institution shows particular strengths in accommodation, with a rating of 4.21, closely followed by professors and location, both scoring 4.13. Areas for potential improvement include student life and internationality, which received lower marks at 3.8. Facilities and value for money are rated moderately well, around 4.0 and 3.9 respectively.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Remarkably, this institution garners very high scores in nearly all aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest point, receiving a near-perfect rating. Student Life and Facilities also score exceptionally well. The area with the lowest rating, though still strong, is Location, indicating room for minor improvement.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising academic quality, professors, and the international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) notes administrative issues or curriculum shortcomings.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~90% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.8/5. Students praise attentive professors, high-quality teaching, and a professional, application-oriented learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry-expert instructors, and personalized professor attention. One review expressed concerns about unprofessional faculty.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
All 16 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5. Students praise the enriching, business-focused education and practical application of neuroscience knowledge.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
A great variety in a magnificent environment that favors study. Very good attention from teachers and small groups.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
