EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO
Side-by-side comparison from 627 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and practical application
- +Enriching international and multi-cultural environment
- +Supportive and welcoming community and staff
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Flexible online and on-campus study options
- +High-quality faculty and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Supportive community and international environment
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Practical and professional-led programs
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Engaging academic environment and relevant courses
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and ineffective processes.
- -Lack of promised program focus.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Low educational quality & irrelevant programs
- -Lack of student support & career assistance
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unqualified and unprofessional instructors
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
This institution garners notable acclaim, particularly for its exceptional location, which received the highest rating. Internationality and student life also stand out as strong points. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect compared to other assessed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a generally positive standing across various university life elements.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
When considering university feedback, internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Location and professors also score very well. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. Facilities and student life are moderately rated, while value falls in the middle.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
The university garners a generally positive assessment from students. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.27. Conversely, Internationality received the lowest score at 3.76. Other categories such as Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are all rated well above 4, indicating a solid overall experience, with Student Life also scoring respectably at 3.94.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic quality, expert professors, and enriching multicultural environments. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) mentioned issues with course communication and administrative inflexibility.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, quality professors, and community. Negative feedback, about 14.3%, points to administrative issues and perceived low educational quality.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~78% of feedback), highlighting excellent academic environments, engaged faculty, and great learning opportunities. A small portion (~5.6%) of feedback notes issues with staff or program management.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
