EADA Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs University of Vigo vs ESAD Escola Superior de Arte Dramático de Galicia
Side-by-side comparison from 364 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international community and networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with practical business applications
- +Positive personal and professional development experiences
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Excellent professors and strong academic programs
- +Welcoming and diverse student environment
- +High employability and available student support services
- +Excellent teachers and academic support leading to great results.
- +Pleasant and clean campus environment.
- +Affordable food options.
- +International environment and diverse perspectives
- +Practical application of neuroscience to business challenges
- +Engaging and insightful learning with relevant skills
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -- Lack of effective career services and job placement support.
- -- Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and arbitrary grading.
- -- Administrative inflexibility and poor communication regarding program logistics.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear course structures.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities require urgent repairs.
- -Poor transportation links and distance from the city.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as unsatisfactory.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This university garners particularly high marks for its Location, with a near-perfect score. Student Life and Internationality also stand out as strong areas. Among the lower-scoring categories, Accommodations received the least favorable rating, followed by Facilities. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive reception across most assessed aspects.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** being the standout area. The university also received strong marks for its **Professors** and **Accommodation**. Areas that performed less strongly include **Location** and **Facilities**. **Internationality** and **Value** received good, though not exceptional, scores.
This institution achieves exceptional scores in several key areas, notably in its **professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect marks. Its facilities are also rated highly. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **accommodation**, which received a moderate rating compared to the other exceptional categories.
Overall, the university receives very positive feedback, with exceptional scores in value (5), professors (4.875), and internationality (4.875). Facilities and student life are also highly rated at 4.857. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 4.285, though still a solid rating. Location also scores well at 4.667.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Around 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting a multicultural environment, practical learning, and strong networking. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with career services and administrative rigidity.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good careers, excellent professors, and a welcoming student environment. A small percentage of negative feedback exists, with one mention of outdated evaluation regulations and another of faculty issues.
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights excellent teachers, a good campus, and affordable amenities. There is no negative feedback to report.
All ten reviews are positive, with students praising the program's international environment and practical application of neuroscience to business. They highlight the valuable knowledge gained, career impact, and engaging classes.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
