SKEMA Business School vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT vs Milpark Education
Side-by-side comparison from 666 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors
- +Practical, career-focused education
- +Student-centered support and safety
- +Excellent support services and helpful faculty
- +Vibrant and organized campus life with social activities
- +Beautiful campus environment conducive to study
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Welcoming and engaging campus environment
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Welcoming and supportive environment with approachable staff
- +Strong academic programmes and practical learning
- +Diversity and opportunities for personal growth
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -- Administrative and communication issues are a significant problem.
- -- Lack of resources and outdated facilities hinder learning.
- -- Accommodation and student support services are insufficient.
- -Lack of practical experience and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on targets over academics.
- -Language barriers making academic engagement difficult.
- -Persistent accommodation problems and administrative errors with marks.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -Communication, particularly from staff and administration, is frequently lacking or unclear.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
Generally positive feedback emerges from the university's ratings, with professors and value for money receiving the highest scores at 4.08. Student life and location also score well, both at 3.8. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating at 3.12, and internationality, scoring 3.43. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.63.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Value for money stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities. Student Life and Professors also receive commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower than the top-performing metrics.
This university scores exceptionally well in **Location (4.5)** and **Facilities (4.39)**, indicating these are its strongest aspects. Student life, professors, and value also receive solid ratings. The **Accomodation (3.72)** is the lowest-rated area, suggesting room for improvement, while Internationality also falls slightly below the average of other categories.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution excels in Value, achieving a high score of 4.52. Facilities, Student Life, and Professors also received strong ratings around 4.35. Location and Accomodation are well-regarded, though Internationality presents the weakest area at 3.84. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive performance, particularly in areas of financial merit and student experience.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
Around ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good instructors and practical, career-focused education. Negative feedback (~9.8%) mentions issues with academic records, accommodation shortages, and some safety concerns.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 414 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campuses, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. Very minimal negative feedback exists.
With a 4.3/5 average rating and ~85% positive feedback, students praise hands-on learning, supportive lecturers, and engaging campus life. A small amount of feedback (~5%) mentioned issues with online registration and accommodation.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
With 100% positive feedback and a 4.65 average rating, students consistently praise the university's welcoming and diverse environment, supportive staff, and strong academic programs. They value the learning opportunities and a peaceful campus atmosphere.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.
Nothing to show
The university was isolated from the real world, I couldn’t connect my studies with the field of work available. Negative for career development. The university students were politically aware of what was happening in the country at the time. Positive as the student played crucial role in bringing political consciousness.
Nothing to show
