SKEMA Business School vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education vs i_Xperience
Side-by-side comparison from 1,089 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-focused learning and career opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and personal growth
- +Excellent teaching quality and supportive student life
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and timely graduation
- +Reliable student services
- +Calm and positive environment
- +Inclusive and supportive environment
- +Strong academic and practical learning
- +Dedicated and approachable staff
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam management.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Disorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with inconsistent evaluation methods.
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
- -Rising study fees and unexpected module changes cause financial strain and dropouts.
- -Overcrowded lecture classes detract from the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
With a well-rounded set of evaluations, this university demonstrates particular strengths in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value are all rated positively, indicating a generally favorable student experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
An excellent student experience is evident, with top marks awarded for Facilities and Student Life, alongside high scores for Internationality. The university also performs well in terms of Professors and Accomodation. Its weakest area, according to these ratings, is Value, which received a moderate score. Location also garnered a good but not outstanding rating.
Overall, this institution garners favorable ratings, particularly excelling in **Value**, its strongest area. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Location** also received high scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** represent the areas with comparatively lower, though still decent, ratings.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
The vast majority of reviews (~91%) praise the university for personal and professional growth opportunities, strong industry links, and excellent teaching quality. A small percentage of feedback (~2.4%) mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
The single review indicates a positive experience, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a calm and welcoming atmosphere, reliable services, and timely graduation.
With an average rating of 4.43/5, ~91% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, academic support, and welcoming environments. A small percentage (~9%) express concerns about rising study fees and module changes.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university was isolated from the real world, I couldn’t connect my studies with the field of work available. Negative for career development. The university students were politically aware of what was happening in the country at the time. Positive as the student played crucial role in bringing political consciousness.
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
