SKEMA Business School vs Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR vs Hochschule Fresenius vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 172 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR: wins 3/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 0/7 categories
Carlos Albizu University: wins 0/7 categories
NUC University: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
Win
3.50
3.67
3.43
3.83
Not rated
1.00
Location
4.25
4.88
5.00
Win
4.64
4.92
Not rated
1.00
Professors
4.42
4.56
4.00
3.86
4.58
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.36
4.22
3.67
4.50
4.92
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.11
4.44
Win
3.33
4.07
4.08
Not rated
1.00
Value
4.03
4.44
Win
4.00
3.64
4.17
Not rated
1.00
Accommodation
3.57
4.33
Win
3.00
2.50
3.67
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong international exposure & opportunities
  • +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
  • +valuable alumni network & career support
  • +Diverse, high-quality academic programs and career opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and a strong sense of community and personal growth
  • +Open, inclusive, and professional campus environment
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support

Nothing to show

  • +Strong marketing and business programs
  • +Excellent career services and job placement
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum structure lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative and support services after enrollment.
  • -Unresolved financial and logistical issues.
  • -Lack of communication and assistance from staff.
Rating summary
What students say

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.

This academic institution garners praise across multiple facets, with exceptional marks for **location** (4.88) and **professors** (4.56). Student life and overall value also receive strong scores around 4.44. The weakest area identified is **facilities**, rated at 3.5. Other positive aspects include accommodations and internationality, both scoring above 4.2.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in providing a strong international experience and boasts exceptional professors, earning a perfect score in both areas. However, it struggles significantly in several key aspects, receiving the lowest possible rating for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. These low scores suggest potential areas for considerable improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.55/5. Students highlight excellent faculty, diverse programs, and a supportive environment for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Nothing to show

One review (100% negative) gave a 1/5 rating. The student described very poor post-enrollment service, citing unresponsiveness and unresolved financial issues.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
60%
33%
21%
67%
0%
0%
4★
42%
50%
67%
50%
25%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close