London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Glasgow Caledonian University
Side-by-side comparison from 635 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
- +Diverse and multicultural environment
- +Career-focused and practical learning opportunities
- +Supportive tutors and helpful resources
- +Engaging course content with practical application
- +Strong sense of community and social life
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
- +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
- +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
- +Exceptional MBA program and knowledgeable, supportive faculty.
- +Strong marketing and business specialisations with engaging teaching methods.
- +Excellent support systems and career opportunities for students.
- +Strong student support and inclusive environment.
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Relevant courses and career preparation.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of support from the program office.
- -Insufficient preparation for the real working world.
- -Delayed result publication and unhelpful professors are major concerns.
- -The facilities are outdated and need modernization.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
- -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Unreasonable payment deadlines conflicting with student finance release.
- -Poor communication and unclear financial expectations.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded, with a rating of over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, falling below 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, generally ranging from approximately 3.9 to 4.1.
With outstanding scores in **Internationality** (4.67), this institution also boasts strong performances in **Facilities** (4.47) and **Professors** (4.47). **Value** (4.45) is also highly rated. The **Accommodation** (4.06) is the lowest scoring area, though still a respectable figure, with **Location** (4.14) and **Student Life** (4.17) also performing moderately well.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.
This institution scores highly across several key aspects, notably achieving perfect marks for Location and Value. Student Life and Facilities also received strong ratings, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area is Accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Internationality and Professors also reflect solid performance, contributing to a well-rounded assessment.
Performance across key university metrics shows a generally positive reception. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Accommodation, however, presents the weakest area according to these ratings. Internationality and value also score well, indicating broad strengths, while facilities and location fall in the middle of the spectrum.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse courses, supportive mentors, and welcoming staff. A small percentage of feedback (~7%) mentions issues with course structure and facilities.
With a 4.42 average rating from 98 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong course content, practical application, community, and social life. A small ~2% of reviews mentioned issues with delayed results and professor engagement.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.71/5. Students praise supportive professors and staff, strong course content, and excellent library facilities. The location is also highlighted as a benefit.
Strong support services and dedicated lecturers are frequently praised, creating a positive learning environment for ~89% of students. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with enrollment and payment processes.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
