University of California Los Angeles - UCLA vs SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 263 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible, passionate professors and strong academic programs
- +Abundant career development resources and support
- +Connected, nurturing campus environment and community
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Supportive and engaging faculty and advisors
- +Affordable tuition and flexible learning options
- +Welcoming and close-knit community atmosphere
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management staff.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency regarding policies and decisions.
Nothing to show
Evaluations indicate a strong overall performance for the institution. Professors and Facilities received the highest marks, suggesting excellence in academic instruction and campus resources. While Student Life and Value are also well-regarded, Accomodation and Internationality are the comparatively weaker areas, indicating potential room for improvement in those specific aspects of the university experience.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its facilities, achieving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Location and accommodation also stand out with strong ratings at 4.5. Internationality and value are similarly well-regarded, both scoring 4.625. While still strong, professors and student life received slightly lower, yet still positive, scores of 4.25 and 4.2857 respectively, indicating these are the areas with the most room for enhancement.
Nothing to show
With 95 reviews and a 4.27/5 average, students highly praise the university's quality education, approachable professors, and career development resources. Nearly all feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
With an average rating of 4.63/5 from 8 reviews, students praise the close-knit environment, supportive professors, and affordability. Positive themes include personal growth, flexibility, diversity, and engaging events, with ~0% negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
