Università degli Studi di Trieste vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs Rome Business School vs MIB Trieste School of Management vs International School for Advanced Studies SISSA

Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International Centre for Theoretical Physics - ICTP (5.00)
Università degli Studi di Trieste: wins 0/5 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/5 categories
Rome Business School: wins 0/5 categories
MIB Trieste School of Management: wins 0/5 categories
International School for Advanced Studies SISSA: wins 0/5 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 0/5 categories
International Centre for Theoretical Physics - ICTP: wins 5/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: International MBA
Best programme: MBA in International Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Best programme: Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.29
3.76
4.15
4.63
Not rated
4.57
5.00
Win
Location
5.00
4.26
4.57
4.74
Not rated
4.29
5.00
Professors
4.29
4.09
4.46
4.67
Not rated
4.86
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.14
4.18
4.76
4.60
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Student life
4.14
3.91
4.21
4.71
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Value
4.71
4.18
4.36
4.69
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.14
3.23
3.77
4.46
Not rated
4.17
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic knowledge and practical application
  • +Supportive professors and student services
  • +Vibrant extracurriculars and engaging city life
  • +International experience and opportunities
  • +Practical, innovative, and hands-on learning
  • +Strong academic programs and engaging professors
  • +Practical, real-world application of knowledge
  • +Quality of lecturers and academic team mentorship
  • +Industry connections and company visits
  • +Expert professors, practical curriculum, and networking opportunities.
  • +Supportive community and career integration support.
  • +Beautiful location and enriching overall experience.

Nothing to show

  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
  • +High-quality teaching and research
  • +Focus on diversity and international culture
  • +Valuable student support services
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods often lack relevance and engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Poor course structure and insufficient depth
  • -Lack of responsiveness and poor organization
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern, including unfulfilled promises, demands for extra fees, and communication breakdowns.
  • -Outdated course content and lack of practical opportunities like internships are disappointing.
  • -The institution's unprofessionalism and perceived dishonesty are major drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support for students are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, particularly in **Location**, which received a perfect score. **Value** also stands out with a rating of 4.7. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are both highly regarded at 4.3. Areas that, while still strong, show a slight dip include **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**, all rated at 4.1.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving the highest rating at 4.26. It also scores very well in **professors** (4.09) and **internationality** (4.18), with **value** also rated highly (4.18). Student life is also a strong point at 3.91. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.23, and **facilities** are moderately rated at 3.76.

This university garners strong approval, particularly excelling in **Internationality** and **Location**, both rated very highly. **Professors** and **Value** also received excellent scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a noticeably lower rating compared to other aspects. Student life and facilities also maintain positive, though less exceptional, scores.

This institution achieves strong overall scores, with location and student life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas. The university also garners high marks for its professors and value for money. Among the evaluated aspects, accommodation received the lowest, though still respectable, rating. Internationality and facilities also scored favorably.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

This institution achieves a perfect score of 5 across all evaluated aspects. The university excels uniformly in its facilities, the quality of its professors, desirable location, vibrant student life, accommodation offerings, international outlook, and overall value. No specific areas emerge as stronger or weaker, as all categories demonstrate an outstanding performance.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.22 average rating from 9 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the learning environment, practical applications, and helpful professors. The city's atmosphere and extracurriculars are also frequently highlighted.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities and practical projects. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor organization and communication issues.

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable program content and practical industry connections. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback concerns administrative issues and unmet expectations.

All 42 student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.81/5. Students praise knowledgeable professors, practical curriculum, and excellent networking opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%) highlights productive and interesting experiences due to high-quality teaching, research, and promotion of diversity.

Rating distribution
5★
22%
49%
66%
81%
0%
86%
100%
4★
78%
27%
22%
19%
0%
14%
0%
3★
0%
18%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

Great year

Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. ​Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.

Deep practical knowledge over superficial theory

The core strength of MIB Trieste lies in its sharp focus on practical application. Rather than providing superficial high-level overviews, the curriculum delivers real depth across every module, ensuring you walk away with usable, actionable knowledge rather than just academic theories. The program bridges high-level strategic concepts with real-world execution very effectively. ​If there is one area with room for improvement, it would be the career placement framework, which could be slightly more proactive in supporting candidates during their job search. That said, the academic rigor and practical readiness you gain more than compensate for it, making it a valuable experience overall. I highly recommend it to professionals looking for solid operational knowledge.

Nothing to show

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close