The University of Manchester vs Salford Business School vs University of Bolton vs General Assembly vs Business Consort

Side-by-side comparison from 357 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
The University of Manchester: wins 0/7 categories
Salford Business School: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bolton: wins 0/7 categories
General Assembly: wins 4/7 categories
Business Consort: wins 0/7 categories
UCEN Manchester: wins 0/7 categories
Global Banking School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
309 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
17 reviews
×
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Cloud and Network Security
New York City, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Manchester, The United Kingdom
3.90
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.47
4.32
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.30
4.00
Location
4.52
4.41
4.11
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.10
4.00
Professors
4.22
4.59
4.16
4.00
Not rated
4.10
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.56
4.59
3.79
3.00
Not rated
3.60
5.00
Win
Student life
4.39
4.18
4.05
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.12
4.59
4.21
4.00
Not rated
3.70
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.67
3.88
3.42
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspiring and engaging learning environment with supportive and responsive tutors.
  • +Vibrant student life and social experiences alongside academic pursuits.
  • +High-quality, well-structured, and engaging programmes, including online options.
  • +High-quality, relevant, and well-structured programmes.
  • +Supportive and accessible academic and administrative staff.
  • +Excellent online learning platform and extensive library resources.
  • +Passionate and supportive lecturers
  • +Engaging learning experiences and industry-relevant courses
  • +Excellent facilities and school environment
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and friendly staff/tutors
  • +Welcoming and collaborative student atmosphere
  • +Interesting courses and strong academic staff
  • +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
  • +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
Cons
  • -Outdated or non-functional facilities and lack of practical experience.
  • -Unorganized course structure and unhelpful, unresponsive, or self-promoting lecturers.
  • -Difficulty in reaching professors and poor communication regarding course relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -A lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Misleading course promises and career advice.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university presents a strong showing across most metrics. Its highest-rated aspects include Internationality and Location, both exceeding 4.5. Student Life and Facilities also score well above average. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, registering significantly lower than other categories. Value and Professors also received solid, though not leading, scores.

This institution receives commendable ratings, particularly excelling in Professors, Internationality, and Value, all scoring an impressive 4.59. Facilities and Location are also highly rated at 4.47 and 4.41 respectively. Student Life is rated well at 4.18. The area with the lowest rating is Accomodation, coming in at 3.88.

With a robust overall rating, the university excels particularly in its **facilities**, which scored 4.32. Professors also received strong marks at 4.16, followed closely by location and value. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, with a rating of 3.42, while internationality also scored moderately lower than other categories. Student life rounds out the positive feedback.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Nothing to show

This university garners high marks for its **facilities**, achieving a commendable 4.3. Professors and location also receive positive feedback, both scoring 4.1. Student life and accommodation are rated a solid 4. However, the university's **internationality** stands out as its weakest area, with a rating of 3.6, followed closely by its value at 3.7.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~98.7% positive sentiment (4.25/5 average), students praise engaging teaching, strong support, and a vibrant campus life. Limited negative feedback (~1.3%) mentions course structure and professor accessibility issues.

All 17 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight excellent modules, supportive staff, and high-quality education equipping them for real-life situations. The university's facilities and online learning platform are also frequently praised.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive reviews, with approximately 100% of feedback being favorable. Students praise passionate lecturers and the engaging academic environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.9/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly staff, good facilities, and a supportive atmosphere. A small percentage of feedback (~10%) mentions issues with course guidance.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
53%
53%
100%
0%
30%
100%
4★
49%
47%
37%
0%
0%
40%
0%
3★
11%
0%
11%
0%
0%
20%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Practical

The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.

QUALITY OF EDUCATION

University of Salford has one of the best standards and quality of education. Their courses are of high quality and they offer very good programmes.My time with the school has been very good as they are supportive in all areas of need and the school is very flexible in times of financial and academic challenges.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close