SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs University of the People - UoPeople vs Schiller International University vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 3,516 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Affordable, quality, US-accredited degrees
- +Flexible online learning for balancing responsibilities
- +Well-structured, comprehensive programs
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +Strong academic programs and dedicated faculty
- +Diverse student body and inclusive environment
- +Proximity to NYC and abundant opportunities
- +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
- +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
- +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including data breaches and unclear policies.
- -Unexpectedly high costs, particularly through mandatory exam fees.
- -Difficulties with the online learning platform and lack of community support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are problematic.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This institution garners high marks across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.83) and Professors (4.74), indicating excellent global engagement and teaching quality. Student Life and Facilities also score very well. The weakest, though still respectable, category is Accomodation (4.26), suggesting this is an area with room for improvement compared to other strengths. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
A notable performer, this institution excels in its facilities, receiving a strong 4.6. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded with a near-perfect 4.8. Accommodation and student life also score highly. The weakest area identified is internationality, with a rating of 3.8. Value for money is also a positive, coming in at 4.2.
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
A vast majority of reviews (~99.7%) are highly positive, praising affordability, flexibility, and quality online programs. A few negative comments mention navigation, data breaches, and exam fees.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 and no negative feedback, reviews highlight strong academics, diversity, and campus life. Students appreciate the university's balance of personalized attention and resources, along with proximity to NYC.
Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
My experience at the University of the People was positive and rewarding. The online learning format allowed me to pursue my BSc in Health Science while managing other responsibilities. I gained valuable knowledge in public health, epidemiology, human biology, and health services. The coursework helped me strengthen my research, critical thinking, and academic writing skills. I also appreciated the opportunity to study with students from different backgrounds. The programme required discipline, time management, and independent learning, especially when meeting weekly deadlines. Although online study requires personal commitment, the flexible structure and affordable education made the journey worthwhile. I graduated Cum Laude, and I am grateful for the knowledge and foundation I gained. I recommend UoPeople to students seeking flexible, accessible higher education.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
