SKEMA Business School vs William Paterson University - WP vs Huntington University vs Schiller International University vs General Assembly
Side-by-side comparison from 195 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Modern resources & diverse environment
- +Strong academic staff & faculty
- +High graduation rate
- +Inclusive and supportive campus environment
- +Engaging extracurriculars and personal development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and student well-being support
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and dedicated faculty
- +Diverse student body and inclusive environment
- +Proximity to NYC and abundant opportunities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and unresponsive communication are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some instructors lacking engagement.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are problematic.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are consistently criticized.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution garners perfect scores. Strengths are evident in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Conversely, no specific areas lag behind, as all ratings are consistently outstanding.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Value** and **Professors**, receiving the highest marks in these areas. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score well. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest aspect, with the lowest rating. The remaining categories, including **Location** and **Internationality**, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential development.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
A notable performer, this institution excels in its facilities, receiving a strong 4.6. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded with a near-perfect 4.8. Accommodation and student life also score highly. The weakest area identified is internationality, with a rating of 3.8. Value for money is also a positive, coming in at 4.2.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 5/5 average rating, the university is highly praised. Students highlight excellent modern resources, faculty diversity, and strong academic staff, particularly in Arts. A high graduation rate is also a notable positive.
All eight reviews are positive, averaging 4.13/5 stars. Students highlight diversity, well-organized extracurriculars, and a supportive learning environment with skilled professors and counselors. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 and no negative feedback, reviews highlight strong academics, diversity, and campus life. Students appreciate the university's balance of personalized attention and resources, along with proximity to NYC.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
