EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences vs Hochschule Fresenius
Side-by-side comparison from 304 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Welcoming staff, helpful student buddies, and supportive community
- +Strong industry co-op and career-focused programs
- +Excellent campus facilities and central Munich location
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teaching and motivating academic environment
- +Strong international reputation and career opportunities
- +Innovative research and modern facilities
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent complaints.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging or relevant course content.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Considerably positive feedback is evident across most surveyed aspects. The university excels notably in **Internationality**, receiving its highest score, closely followed by **Professors** and **Value**. The weakest area is **Facilities**, which received the lowest rating. Other categories such as Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received solid scores around the 4.0 mark.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding marks across most aspects, with a perfect score in Internationality. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life all received a strong 4.5, indicating excellent offerings in these key areas. Accommodation, while good at 4, represents the lowest-rated category. Value is also highly regarded at 4.5.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise the welcoming staff and students, English-taught programs, and strong industry connections. Accommodation and campus facilities are also highlighted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise excellent teaching, innovative research, and strong career opportunities.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
