EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 507 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong personal and leadership development
- +Practical business knowledge from experienced professionals
- +Valuable real-world application of learning
- +Supportive staff and strong student-staff relationships
- +International environment and diverse community
- +Practical curriculum and interactive classes
- +Expert and passionate lecturers
- +Practical curriculum with real-world application
- +Diverse international community and networking opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Engaging, practical, and relevant course content
- +Expert professors and supportive staff
- +Real-world application and industry connections
- +Excellent facilities and creative space
- +Access to industry professionals and top restaurants
- +Comprehensive administrative and career-focused curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant inconvenience.
- -Program content can be too basic or poorly implemented.
- -Facilities are not always well-maintained or up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality and facilities are subpar.
- -Extracurricular activities and career support are neglected.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause poor student support.
- -Low academic quality and outdated facilities hinder learning.
- -Lack of program value and unfulfilled internship promises are disappointing.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and resources for students is frequently mentioned.
With an overall strong performance, the university excels particularly in its Location, receiving a near-perfect score. Internationality and Student Life also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, Accomodation represents the weakest area of assessment, though still within a generally positive range. The remaining categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.7. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive feedback, averaging above 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating. **Professors** and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores, indicating satisfactory but not outstanding performance in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Internationality**, scoring a near-perfect 4.63, and its **Location**, rated at 4.45. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.12. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 2.75. Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its notable strengths.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
With overwhelmingly positive feedback, this institution shines brightest in its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Areas like location and internationality also perform exceptionally well, scoring 4.8. The institution demonstrates a consistently high standard across all evaluated aspects.
This institution presents a well-rounded academic and student experience. Its strongest points are the excellent location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. While all other areas are rated highly at a 4 out of 5, there are no significant weaknesses to report. Facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all contribute to a positive overall impression.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (over 97%), highlighting excellent experiences, personal growth, and practical business learning. A very small percentage of feedback mentions minor issues with program communication and administration.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff and international environments. Around 7% of feedback is negative, with minor concerns about organization and academic challenge.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical curriculum, and international community. Negative feedback (~14%) points to administrative issues and varied academic quality.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
All 7 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students highly praise the innovative programs blending neuroscience with business and marketing, engaging classes, expert professors, and practical applications.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent equipment and creative space. They also appreciate professional classes and valuable administrative knowledge for culinary careers.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
