Université de Caen - UNICAEN vs emlyon business school vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Forward College
Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and engaged faculty
- +Vibrant student city and lively campus environment
- +Diverse programs and professional integration
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-relevant programmes
- +International environment and global opportunities
- +Inspiring professors and strong teaching quality
- +International and diverse student community
- +Interactive and engaging teaching methods
- +Personal and academic growth opportunities
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt operations.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of support frustrate students.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Mediocre teaching and perceived lack of educational value.
- -The institution feels like a money-making scheme rather than a place of learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -A lack of communication and transparency from the institution is prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
With a generally strong showing, this university excels particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both earning an impressive 4.75. Student life and internationality also received high marks. However, the university's **accommodation** and **facilities** represent areas with room for improvement, scoring 3.5 and 3.75 respectively. Value for money is rated moderately.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This university achieves excellent scores in its facilities and internationality, both receiving a 4.22 rating. Professors are also highly regarded with a 4.11 score. Value for money is rated a solid 4. The weakest areas appear to be student life and accommodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.75 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Remarkably high scores characterize this university's offerings. Professors receive exceptional praise, closely followed by strong marks for location and student life. Accommodations are the lowest-rated category, though still at a respectable level. Other areas like facilities, internationality, and value also garnered positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience.
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
University of Caen Normandy receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%), with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise student life, diverse programs, and supportive services. Helpful teachers and engaging courses are recurring themes.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic and professional growth, practical application of knowledge, and an international environment. A single negative review criticized the institution as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
All 31 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students highlight the enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching that fosters personal growth and critical thinking.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
Nothing to show
