EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 529 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International and multicultural environment
- +Practical and real-world business focus
- +High academic standard and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
- +Practical, interactive learning with strong career focus
- +Welcoming community and international environment
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Expert and supportive instructors
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences like workshops and shootings
- +Modern facilities and extensive industry-relevant resources
- +Engaging, practical, and relevant course content
- +Expert professors and supportive staff
- +Real-world application and industry connections
- -Administrative and communication issues
- -Outdated or poorly designed course structure
- -Lack of practical application or depth in coursework
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic and lacking proper support.
- -Facilities and extracurriculars are underdeveloped and not prioritized.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
This university garners strong approval across multiple aspects. Its location stands out as the highest-rated area, closely followed by internationality and student life. While accommodations are rated slightly lower than other categories, they still represent a solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a high level of satisfaction among students.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.4. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, generally above 3.8.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Outstanding marks are awarded for the university's **Location**, which received a perfect score. Areas of particular strength also include **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all scoring above 4.3. **Value** is another highly rated aspect, coming in at 4.67. The university's **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received solid ratings of 4.0, representing its relatively weaker, though still good, performance.
With overwhelmingly positive feedback, this institution shines brightest in its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Areas like location and internationality also perform exceptionally well, scoring 4.8. The institution demonstrates a consistently high standard across all evaluated aspects.
~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments and practical, real-world business applications. A small amount of feedback (~2%) mentions administrative issues and unmet expectations regarding specific program content.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting career services, supportive staff, and an international environment. About 7.4% are negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are highly positive, praising professional teachers, workshops, and modern facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 7 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students highly praise the innovative programs blending neuroscience with business and marketing, engaging classes, expert professors, and practical applications.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The professional teachers, the shootings and workshops! The university is really beautiful and modern. We received a lot of information about fashion and stylists, magazines and the library it was really cool!
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
