IESE Business School vs Universitat de Barcelona - UB vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 399 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Renowned scholars and engaging, supportive professors
- +Vibrant international environment and diverse student body
- +Inspiring city and enriching academic programmes
- +Supportive and professional faculty, fostering independent problem-solving.
- +Relevant curriculum with a balance of theory and practical application.
- +Excellent facilities, innovative focus, and positive campus environment.
- +Flexible online model and well-structured virtual platform
- +Autonomy and personalized learning pace
- +Accessible and responsive faculty support
- +Practical, applied learning focus
- +Engaging, creative teaching methods
- +Supportive and inspiring instructors
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Dedicated teaching staff and cutting-edge facilities
- +All-embracing campus atmosphere
- +Flexible housing options
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for students.
- -Ineffective and outdated teaching methods from instructors.
- -Limited digital resources and lack of personalized support.
- -Lack of focus on quality over difficulty
- -Overly competitive and high failure rates in subjects
- -- Administrative and communication issues lead to confusion and lack of support.
- -- Unclear and inconsistent assessment criteria hinder academic progress.
- -- Disorganized content and poor web usability create a frustrating learning experience.
- -Disappointing value for money, especially for full-time programs.
- -Inconsistent and inadequate course materials and instruction.
- -Poor organization and communication from staff.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a concern.
- -Limited academic support and unengaging teaching methods are disliked.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
Generally, this university garners positive feedback from students. Location and value are particular strengths, both scoring above 4.0. Student life also receives high marks. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, with a rating of 3.89. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately well, falling just below the 4.0 threshold. Professors also received a solid rating.
This university receives high marks, particularly for its **Value (4.11)**, indicating strong student satisfaction with the overall return on investment. **Professors (4.01)** are also a significant strength. Among the lower-rated areas, **Internationality (3.78)** and **Location (3.79)** present opportunities for improvement, though still within a generally positive range. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation all fall comfortably in the upper 3s.
This institution received its highest marks for location, with a score of 3.85. Internationality and value were also strong points, both scoring above 3.7. Conversely, student life presented the weakest area, registering a 2.7. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores. Professors were rated favorably, indicating a generally positive, albeit uneven, university experience.
This institution garners impressive ratings across multiple facets, notably excelling in **Internationality (4.8)** and **Professors (4.75)**. Facilities and Student Life also score highly at 4.65. Areas scoring lower, though still strong, include Location and Accommodation, both at 4.41. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with outstanding marks in its global reach and academic staff.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received no rating, indicating these areas may require significant attention or were not assessed. The university appears to excel in its core offerings and student support infrastructure.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising academics, international environment, and supportive professors. A small percentage (around 3.9%) mentions administrative process speed and outdated facilities.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (99%) highlights professional and supportive teachers, effective learning of problem-solving skills, and new, clean campus facilities. Minimal negative feedback exists.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility and a well-structured online platform. A small portion of feedback (~12%) is negative, mentioning issues with instruction clarity, administrative errors, and customer service.
With an average rating of 4.8/5 based on 20 reviews, ~95% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights practical application, creative thinking, and inspiring teachers. A single negative review (5%) found the full-time program costly for limited class hours.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
The sole review is highly positive, rating 4/5 stars. This indicates strong satisfaction with dedicated teaching, modern facilities, campus atmosphere, and housing options. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Honestly, I didn't attend class that often, so my connection to the university was more practical than emotional. I appreciated the resources, but I felt disconnected from campus culture. In hindsight, I'd have engaged more, but I also believe that university should facilitate more digital resources and support for those who, for whatever reason, can't always attend in person.
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
