Babes-Bolyai University - UBB vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA vs Tiffin University Bucharest

Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA (4.50)
Babes-Bolyai University - UBB: wins 0/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 0/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA: wins 4/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Bogdan Voda University - UBV: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
3.98
Not rated
4.80
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.46
3.82
Not rated
4.83
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.14
4.15
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.75
4.33
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.33
3.97
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.23
3.98
Not rated
4.83
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.50
3.82
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse academic programs and international opportunities
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
  • +Modern facilities and a vibrant social atmosphere
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and accessible professors
  • +Relevant and enriching programmes
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and networking

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Passionate professors and clear explanations
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Effort-based learning and supplemental resources
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
  • -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create a difficult learning environment.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and irrelevant course material are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Performance metrics reveal a university with notable strengths in key areas. Location and student life are highly rated at 4.46 and 4.33 respectively, with value also scoring well at 4.23. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.14. The weakest areas identified are accommodations, rated at 3.50, and internationality at 3.75. Facilities received a rating of 3.88.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **professors (5/5)** and **internationality (5/5)**, along with excellent **value (5/5)**. Facilities, location, and accommodation also receive solid ratings of 4/5. The area with the lowest score is **student life (3/5)**, suggesting room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews highlight diverse programs (~74%), well-trained and engaging professors encouraging critical thinking, and excellent international collaboration opportunities. Facilities are modern and well-maintained, with a positive academic and social experience.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, this university garners highly positive reviews. Students praise the solid program foundation, passionate professors, and relevant curriculum. Practical work is available, encouraging self-driven skill development.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
50%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
58%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
100%
3★
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Faculty of European Studies - Teachers quality (Ms Ciot)

As a student you have high expectations of the teachers - they should be role models and inspire you to learn, be active and have progress. There are some teachers that are the opposite: full of themselves, over-dressed and tona of make-up, looking from somewhere above to all the mortal people that are not like them. Ms Ciot is one of them and students see that she acts superior, she speaks superior and we don't need this. No matter if you are rich or poor, smart or not so smart - you cannot have this attitude - she needs to change or the management needs to take action. We think these people should not be allowed to teach to students - as the country does not need more Ms Ciot Gabriela for sure. Other than this - I feel I can learn - great university and great atmosphere - great covid policy enjoyed it even during hard times - thanks!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close