Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Roma Tre - uniroma3 vs LUISS Guido Carli vs Guglielmo Marconi University

Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Rome Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 2/3 categories
Roma Tre - uniroma3: wins 0/3 categories
LUISS Guido Carli: wins 0/3 categories
Guglielmo Marconi University: wins 0/3 categories
John Cabot University: wins 1/3 categories
SHG Universities: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing and Sales
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: Economics
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.12
4.67
3.89
4.54
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.60
5.00
4.11
4.33
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.48
4.33
4.11
4.36
4.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.73
5.00
3.39
4.36
2.00
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.19
4.33
Win
3.78
4.19
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.27
5.00
3.89
4.29
4.00
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.70
5.00
Win
3.41
3.65
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Global networking and international connections
  • +Strategic understanding of specific industries and market dynamics
  • +Career development support and practical application opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Engaging professors and academic excellence
  • +Supportive campus services and resources
  • +Practical learning experiences and internships
  • +Rigorous academics and top professors
  • +Real-world application and practical skills
  • +Personal and professional development
  • +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
  • +Competent and knowledgeable professors
  • +Convenient telematics access
  • +Structured learning and international community
  • +Positive location and good opportunities
  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Promises made during enrollment are not fulfilled.
  • -Courses are perceived as too basic and lacking real-world application.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
  • -Inadequate teaching style and lack of professor accessibility.
  • -Poor student support and excessive academic pressure.
  • -Language barriers and incompetent staff hinder understanding.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
  • -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
  • -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of effective communication
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with notable strengths and areas for improvement. The institution excels in Internationality (4.73), Location (4.60), and Professors (4.48), indicating a positive perception in these key aspects. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score (3.70), suggesting this is the weakest area according to respondents. Other categories like Student Life (4.19), Value (4.27), and Facilities (4.12) present a more moderate, generally positive, but not standout, performance.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

The university garners praise in several key areas, with professors and location both receiving the highest marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present the weakest aspects, scoring lower than other categories. The overall value proposition is rated positively, reflecting a balanced but uneven performance.

This institution garners exceptional marks in its facilities, achieving a score of 4.54. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, both at 4.36, closely followed by location (4.33) and value (4.29). Student life is also a positive aspect, rated at 4.19. The lowest rated area is accommodation, with a score of 3.65.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.

With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~91% of 44 reviews are positive, highlighting international collaboration, career support, and program flexibility. A small portion (~9%) of negative feedback mentions administrative issues and program quality concerns.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive. Students commend professors' competence and teaching, engaging course content, and organized campus services. A small portion of feedback notes a theoretical approach in some fields.

Nearly 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense, deep courses, real-world challenges, and personal growth. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions an unengaging teaching style and limited student assistance for academic matters.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.

Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
61%
100%
56%
46%
0%
0%
100%
4★
23%
0%
22%
39%
100%
100%
0%
3★
7%
0%
22%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
1★
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Life with RBS

Rome Business School Brand Management and Communication My journey with Rome Business School is an amazing story punctuated by beautiful adventures. My deepest and sincere gratitude to the contact persons and administrative personnel. You are always on hand to guide and assist whenever called upon. Rome Business School is the world in one place-the Eternal City. RBS is an international community with people from various continents, cultures, age, academic and professional disciplines. Here, everyone is cherished, valued and respected; ideas are shared, knowledge imparted, lives transformed, great minds are formed and our cosmos is affected positively. Gifted with humane and academic prowess, whose fame precedes their personages, our professors create an ambience for integral and holistic learning on Campus and Virtually, through engaging conversations. In Rome Business School, dreams become reality, a universal support system is created, and a novel RBS ecosystem is formed between professor and student. Equipped with such amazing opportunities, the sky is but our starting point for greatness.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The research focus

One of the aspects that I really appreciate at Luiss Digital program is the research focus approach. This is really equipping. The live sessions are very interesting as they also help develop public speaking. As a matter of fact, I got a research part-time job with no research skills but thanks to the research methodology courses at LUISS, I was able to pick up pace with the job.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close